Feeds

Google to ICO: We had no idea Street View data slurp was happening

We organise other people's information, not our own

7 Elements of Radically Simple OS Migration

Google has denied that it tried to cover up certain aspects of its Street View data slurp as the UK Information Commissioner's Office reopens its investigation into the incident.

The ICO recently cracked open its cold case files on the Street View cars' sniffing of data from unsecured Wi-Fi networks. This was a result of the US Federal Communications Commission's finding that Google had probably done it deliberately.

The UK regulator's head of enforcement, Steve Eckersley, sent a strongly worded letter to Google demanding answers to seven additional questions, which Google has answered in its own strongly worded letter, seen by The Reg.

The web giant said it was "surprised" that the ICO had decided to reopen its investigation since it thought it had done all the stuff the office told it to do to enhance privacy practices.

Google also denied that the information it sent to the ICO for its initial investigation was "pre-prepared".

The firm said it had mounted a hard drive used by one of its Street View cars in its data centre in Belgium and sent the data to the ICO remotely, as had been agreed upon with the office. Google claims that the only messing it did with the data was to use a software called the Codex to convert the binary data on the drive to readable text, since the ICO had requested information that could be read or searched using keywords.

Other than through using the Codex described above, the data on the hard drive inspected by the ICO was not “pre-prepared” in any way. Indeed, until the ICO’s inspection, Google had not viewed or analysed the payload data on the hard drive used, and nor has it since.

Google also denied that lots of people at the firm knew that the Street View cars were scooping up extra data as they drove along.

"The FCC Report and recent media coverage suggests that there was widespread knowledge. That is not the case," the letter claimed.

"The documents we produced to the FCC, the salient portions of which which we have provided to you, show that, at most, a few people early in the project could have seen some red flags in a document or an email and inquired further. But that assumes too much. These few individuals are unequivocal that they did not learn about the payload collection until May 2010.

"No project leader asked for or wanted the payload data; and no payload data was ever used in any product or service. That’s the context in which the documents Google has disclosed should be viewed," the letter insisted.

The ICO's seven questions to Google were all designed to try to figure out if Google knew more about the data slurp and knew it sooner than it has previously let on.

However, Google dealt with each question and basically summed up that nobody knew anything until May 2010.

The firm said that it hoped its responses would convince the ICO to decide to leave the case closed.

As requested by the ICO, Google has destroyed the data the Street View cars gobbled up, which might make it difficult for the regulator to impose any further sanctions on the firm.

The ICO told The Reg that it had received the letter and it would take it into consideration. ®

Best practices for enterprise data

More from The Register

next story
Sysadmin Day 2014: Quick, there's still time to get the beers in
He walked over the broken glass, killed the thugs... and er... reconnected the cables*
VMware builds product executables on 50 Mac Minis
And goes to the Genius Bar for support
Multipath TCP speeds up the internet so much that security breaks
Black Hat research says proposed protocol will bork network probes, flummox firewalls
Auntie remains MYSTIFIED by that weekend BBC iPlayer and website outage
Still doing 'forensics' on the caching layer – Beeb digi wonk
Microsoft's Euro cloud darkens: US FEDS can dig into foreign servers
They're not emails, they're business records, says court
Microsoft says 'weird things' can happen during Windows Server 2003 migrations
Fix coming for bug that makes Kerberos croak when you run two domain controllers
Cisco says network virtualisation won't pay off everywhere
Another sign of strain in the Borg/VMware relationship?
prev story

Whitepapers

7 Elements of Radically Simple OS Migration
Avoid the typical headaches of OS migration during your next project by learning about 7 elements of radically simple OS migration.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Solving today's distributed Big Data backup challenges
Enable IT efficiency and allow a firm to access and reuse corporate information for competitive advantage, ultimately changing business outcomes.
A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?