Feeds

Facebook set to file motion: Will blame NASDAQ for IPOcalpyse

The fools gave people a chance to think!

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Facebook is planning to file a motion in the US to consolidate all its shareholder lawsuits and blame the NASDAQ stock market for its disappointing IPO.

The social network is finally planning to address the 30 or so lawsuits that have been filed against it after the botched handling of its stocks' opening day and their horrible performance since then, a person familiar with the matter whispered to The New York Times. The social media site could file in New York court as early as today, the insider said.

Facebook had a rough start on the NASDAQ stock exchange as technical glitches held up its share launch and messed up traders' orders for almost the whole day. Stockbrokers' response to not knowing how much stock they'd bought or sold, or at what price, was naturally to stop trading at all or to dump what shares they had.

After a small surge early on, Facebook stocks dropped that day and have experienced little upward motion since. Shares have had small surges, such as the 3.74 per cent rise on yesterday's trading, but the price is still sitting at over 26 per cent below Facebook's initial offer price and 31 per cent below the highest price it reached on its first day of trading.

Shareholders have graphically illustrated their frustration over the performance of what was the most-hyped stock of the last year or so, by filing a slew of lawsuits against Facebook itself, Mark Zuckerberg, other execs, NASDAQ, the banks underwriting the IPO and anyone else they think they can pin the blame on.

Facebook is expected to shift some of the responsibility onto NASDAQ in today's filing, NYT's source said.

NASDAQ has already held its hands up to the technical snafus on the day and is trying to a get a compensation fund of $40m approved that will be handed out to traders and shareholders.

The lead underwriters – Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs – are all expected to join Facebook's motion. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.