The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Apple-Moto patent gripe almost thrown out the door

US judge 'tentatively' dismisses IP lawsuit

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

A US judge has finally gotten as sick of patent cases as the rest of the world and all but thrown out an Apple v Motorola Mobility lawsuit.

Judge Richard Posner has issued a tentative view that the case should be dismissed with prejudice, which would mean that neither of the companies could bring up their whinges again, and cancelled the beginning of the trial.

The "tentative" bit is legalese for the judge not being quite sure yet, but at the moment he reckons that neither of the warring firms have enough evidence to get any damages off each other and that's enough to stop the trial from starting.

He said that he would decide for definite within a week, when he would issue his full opinion, but he warned that he could still change his mind and allow the trial to go ahead.

Both the fruity firm and the now-Google-owned mobile maker were looking for injunctions as well, but Posner said that bans were out of the question.

"Injunctive relieve would impose costs disproportionate to the harm to the patentee and the benefit of the alleged infringement to the alleged infringer and would be contrary to the public interest," he said. "I cannot find a basis for an award of injunctive relief."

Despite the myriad battles between Apple and companies that use Android in their phones (so really against Google), this case had been whittled down already to just two patents on Apple's side and one infringement alleged by Motorola.

Tech lovers everywhere will be hoping that this is the beginning of the end for the Great Patent Wars, so that smartphone-makers can go back to making cool products, while Google is no doubt happy to avoid what would have been the first direct confrontation with the fruity firm since its acquisition of Motorola closed.

But Apple is perhaps not so pleased, since it was fighting to the end to get something out of the case. Judge Posner said that the iPhone-maker had urged him to hold a full evidentiary hearing on its attempt to get a ban at the last minute – at the end of the hearing yesterday afternoon.

The judge also said that Apple wanted declaratory relief, where he would assign rights and duties concerning the patents to the two firms, if no injunction was forthcoming.

Neither Google nor Apple had returned a request for comment at the time of publication. ®

What you need to know about cloud backup

Wow

Can we nominate Judge Posner for the Nobel Peace prize.......he may have just saved the sanity of the planet?

11
0

Re: Poor decision

Er, no.

He's dismissing the case because neither Apple nor Google have done their job sufficiently to allow him to do his job.

There's a subtle difference.

11
1

Silence?

"Neither Google nor Apple had returned a request for comment at the time of publication...."

Well Apple never talk to you anyway and Google are probably too busy drinking champagne and pissing themselves laughing at the moment.

I wonder if Google managed to keep straight faces when the Judge returned his "You can shove your evidentiary hearing up your arse" response to Apple.

8
1

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA whistleblower to tech firms, Obama: 'Grow a pair!'
Ed Snowden: Email tracking grabs 'IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything'
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Google flings another £1m at online child sex abuse vid CRACKDOWN
See, see, we're trying, ad giant tells Daily Mail UK.gov
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
NSA: We COULD track you by your phone ... if we WANTED to
Honestly, too much work, can't be bothered