Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 Dual-X
As one of AMD’s biggest partners, Sapphire have a number of HD 7970 boards in its catalogue. One of the latest is the HD 7970 Dual-X which for around £380 comes factory overclocked and dumps the reference AMD design cooler for a neat dual fan cooling solution. Two 90mm fans sit on top of a large heatsink which takes the heat away from the core via five copper heat pipes.

Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 Dual-X
There’s a tiny two way switch on the on the top of the PCB which controls the boards two BIOSes. Yep the card comes with two BIOS’s, the first one, the standard setting if you like pushes the cards clock speeds up to 950MHz for the core and 1,475 (5.7GHz).
Push the switch to the second BIOS and things get very interesting, the speeds get even higher; 1GHz for the core and 1,450 (5.8GHz) effective for the memory, but on this setting there is the opportunity to raise the cores voltage enabling the clock settings to be pushed even further. Thankfully this mode also allows the fan speed to be increased which should help keep the card cool and stable while being overclocked.
Zotac GeForce GTX 680
Zotac offers a number of variations on the GTX 680 but the basic version is the vanilla box one. Namely, for around £440 you get something that is totally as per Nvidia’s reference design, including clock speeds. The only noticeable differences are the Zotac labels and colour flashed on the cooler.

Zotac GeForce GTX 680
Until the GTX 680 emerged, AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 had its moment in the sun as the fastest single core graphics card available and as such the company had the high-end market pretty much to itself. Yet the arrival of Nvidia's GTX 680 has seriously rained on AMD's parade, taking back the title for the fastest single core card and stirring up the market at the same time.
Verdict
The game is not lost though, as it all depends on the side you take. The AMD's tech in the Sapphire delivers flexibility and value for those who want to experiment with overclocking, thanks to its very effective cooling. Alternatively, for fiddle-free performance, the Zotac Nvidia option looks appealing. That said, Zotac's GXT 680 Amp! Edition offers versatility for extreme tweaks, but you'll need to tweak your budget too. ®
Benchmark Tests
3DMark 11

1080p Extreme Preset: overall score
Longer bars are better
DirectX 11 gaming – DiRT3

1080p 4xFSAA Ultra settings: average frame rate
Longer bars are better
DirectX 11 gaming – Aliens v Predators

1080p average frame rate
Longer bars are better
AMD and Nvidia extreme GPUs workout
COMMENTS
Re: "£600 for a 2560x1440 monitor"
The one with 72% NTSC colour? Not worth the plastic it's housed in. The reason the Dell screens are near £600 and the better quality Hazro too, is because they reproduce 110% NCST or 100% Adobe RGB.
If all you do is pew pew pew on your screen, your budget thing is OK.
If you want a screen with decent colour reproduction then the £600 panels are the way to go. I pew pew pew and I design stuff too so I use a 100% Adobe RGB panel. Colour reproduction is "mmmmmmmmm niiiiiiiicccceee."
You just can't compare quality with budget, sorry.... FAIL.
Also, for anything more than a 1920x1080 resolution, you're talking silly money for the monitor to support it. Most of the 24"+ monitors run at this resolution - you're getting into £600-worth of Dell 27" for 2560x1440, and £950 for 30" of Dell 2560x1600...
Nice
I must convince the people at work that the GTX 680 would sit very nicely in my desktop, if only to test some neat CUDA fluid dynamics code a student has just made (which works nicely on a dual GTX 590 machine in the lab). It is so nice we are getting humongous compute clout for such modest prices, compared to the old Cray J932 and SV1e we used to have.
For a few Frames more.
Flippin – fan boy users – scum bags – riding on planetary meltdown – all for the sake of a few more FPS on Crysis. May you all die in a Day-after-Tomorrow scenario.
(I’ve got a GTX570 myself – still nice)
