Feeds

Falling share price exposes NetApp

Looks vulnerable

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

NetApp's market worth has dropped 51 per cent in 16 months, making it vulnerable to a takeover.

In February 2011 NetApp shares cost $60.60 and its market capitalisation was $21.9 billion. Now it's worth just $10.9 billion with shares trading at $30.02. Why?

Investors think it has gained storage market share relative to Dell, HP and IBM and other companies except EMC - which is growing much, much more quickly.

They think it's vulnerable to hybrid flash/disk array startups like Nimble, Tegile, Tintri and others, all-flash array startups like GreenBytes, Nimbus, Pure Storage, SolidFire, Violin Memory, WhipTail and others. It has no auto-data placement strategy for tiers of SSD and disk storage, relying on caching instead.

Investors could think it is not capitalising enough on its Engenio acquisition and its object storage strategy is stalling.

Yet it has recorded consistently growing results due to shrewd executive management and great operational management. The investor doubters could be totally wrong. Yet the shares are tanking and the company is now affordable to the likes of Cisco, IBM and Oracle.

Will they jump on NetApp and give themselves much stronger clout to compete with EMC? You can see the basic logic easily enough. IBM resells NetApp filers. Cisco needs its own storage capability to be sure of prospering in a world of converged systems. Oracle's storage efforts outside its own Exa-type systems are going nowhere. If one of them pounces that would be a massive move. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Ellison: Sparc M7 is Oracle's most important silicon EVER
'Acceleration engines' key to performance, security, Larry says
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Lenovo to finish $2.1bn IBM x86 server gobble in October
A lighter snack than expected – but what's a few $100m between friends, eh?
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.