Feeds

Microsoft and Nokia dub Google troll moan 'desperate', 'frivolous'

Hello Mr Kettle, will you accept a call from Mr Pot?

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Nokia has labelled Google's patent trolling complaint to the EU "frivolous" and "wrong" while Microsoft said the move was a "desperate tactic".

Google said last night that it had filed a complaint with the European Commission claiming that Nokia and Microsoft colluded to raise mobile prices by sending out patent trolls to do their dirty work.

The Chocolate Factory said the pair had used non-manufacturing companies to pursue lawsuits that Nokia and Microsoft had promised they wouldn't launch.

In particular, the web giant cited Nokia's promises that it wouldn't enforce intellectual property rights against Linux - the core of Google's mobile operating system Android. Google also said that it wasn't the only biz worried about the Nokia tie-up with Microsoft, mentioning Barnes & Noble's concerns as well.

The patent troll in question appears to be Mosaid, which acquired Nokia patents in 2011 and has been pursuing cases using the blueprints.

Microsoft said that the complaint was the kettle calling the pot black.

"Google is complaining about patents when it won’t respond to growing concerns by regulators, elected officials and judges about its abuse of standard-essential patents, and it is complaining about antitrust in the smartphone industry when it controls more than 95 per cent of mobile search and advertising," an MS spokesperson told The Register in an emailed statement today.

"This seems like a desperate tactic on their part."

Nokia had even more to say on the complaint, stating baldly that Google was just plain wrong because the Finnish mobe maker and Redmond keep their intellectual property separate and decide independently what patent strategies to pursue.

On the subject of selling patents to non-manufacturing entities, Nokia said it will flog its gear to anyone who it wants, thank you very much.

"Nokia has made regular patent divestments over the last five years. In each case, any commitments made for standards-essential patents transfer to the acquirer and existing licences for the patents continue," a spokesperson said.

"Had Google asked us, we would have been happy to confirm this, which could then have avoided them wasting the commission's time and resources on such a frivolous complaint," they added scathingly.

The competition watchdog confirmed that it had received a complaint from Google against Nokia and Microsoft, but would not give out any further details. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.