Feeds

LOHAN sucks 27 inches

Mounting excitement down in REHAB

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

New hybrid storage solutions

The epic saga of our shed-built hypobaric chamber – the Rocketry Experimental High Altitude Barosimulator (REHAB) experiment – continues today with the news that we've just laid our hands on a proper vacuum pump which allows LOHAN to suck an impressive 27 inches.

Click here for a bigger version of the LOHAN graphicREHAB newbies should get some background info here and here before proceeding, but for those of you who've followed the project from the off, let's get straight down to it.

After a couple of months of full-fat faffing with fridge compressors, which ultimately clapped out, we went in search of a professional substitute, and found it in the form of the DVP LB.3 oil lubricated rotary vane beast.

The SPB would like to say ta very much to Kate and Pete down at Applied Vacuum Engineering for their advice and ultimately for providing the pump.

So, here's the pump mounted and attached to the REHAB chamber:

Our new vacuum pump connected to the REHAB chamber

As you can see, the chamber's now sporting its lid – a 15mm sheet of Plexiglass – sitting comfortably on the silicone rubber seal, and still with protective film on the upper surface.

In case you're wondering, the transparent lid will allow us to film what happens inside the chamber when the rocket motor ignites. It'll also act as a safety valve, and will pop off when the chamber's internal pressure rises drastically.

Obviously, we don't intend to point a camera straight at the lid. We'll be using a small sacrificial mirror, set at 45°, to avoid blasting our vid kit.

Yes, yes, we hear you cry, that's all very interesting, but what about the new pump? Right, as we've already said, in the configuration seen above it drew a vacuum of 27 inches of mercury. This is roughly equivalent to to an altitude of 55,000ft (16,760m) where the pressure is 76mmHg, for those of you who like a bit of metric.

Our previous attempt managed to hit 44,000ft (13,500m), so we're closer to our original aim of a 15mmHg test environment - equivalent to 76,000ft (23,160m).

We reckon improving our slightly dodgy plumbing might help LOHAN suck another inch or so, although we are wondering whether the test altitude is having an effect on the possible vacuum.

The SPB test facility is at almost exactly 3,610ft (1,100m) above sea level, and according to this handy guide, that's going to limit the pump's performance.

Well, we'll leave the experts among you to argue that one out while we move forward towards the long-awaited REHAB tests. We're still waiting on a last few bits and pieces to arrive, so we'll take the opportunity to tune the REHAB rig and fit the cable feedthroughs we'll need for the thermocouple and rocket motor igniter cables. ®

Further LOHAN resources:

  • New to LOHAN? Try this mission summary for enlightenment.
  • You can find full LOHAN coverage right here.
  • Join the expert LOHAN debate down at Reg forums.
  • All the LOHAN and Paper Aircraft Released Into Space (PARIS) vids live on YouTube.
  • For our SPB photo archive, proceed directly to Flickr.
  • We sometimes indulge in light consensual tweeting, as you can see here.

A tip of the hat to our LOHAN associates

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.