The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Will UK.gov crack down on itself for missing Cookie Law deadline?

In other news - Pope actually Jewish

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Most government websites will fail to comply with new laws on cookies when the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) begins formally enforcing them next week, the Cabinet Office has said, according to reports.

Websites store cookies on a user's computer, but new EU laws say users should be given the choice whether they consent to websites tracking their behaviour.

Although the new laws were implemented in the UK by amendments to the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) last year, the ICO placed a year's hiatus on enforcement action in order to enable organisations time to comply with them. That deadline expires next week, with the ICO set to begin its enforcement regime from 26 May.

However, according to a report by the BBC, the Cabinet Office has said that the "majority" of government websites will not meet the requirements of PECR in time for the deadline.

"As in the private sector, where it is estimated that very few websites will be compliant by the 26th May, so it is true of the government estate," a Cabinet Office spokesman said, according to the BBC. "The majority of department websites will not be compliant with the legislation by that date."

Work is ongoing to ensure that the websites, believed to belong to both local authorities and central Government departments, "achieve compliance at the earliest possible date," the Cabinet Office said, according to the BBC.

In 2009 the EU's Privacy and Electronic Communications (e-Privacy) Directive was changed to demand that storing and accessing information on users' computers was only lawful "on condition that the subscriber or user concerned has given his or her consent, having been provided with clear and comprehensive information … about the purposes of the processing". Consent must be "freely given, specific and informed".

An exception exists where the cookie is "strictly necessary" for the provision of a service "explicitly requested" by the user – so cookies can take a user from a product page to a checkout without the need for consent, for example.

Last year PECR was amended in the UK to implement the changes. It introduced a requirement that website operators generally must obtain users' "informed consent" for the use of cookies.

The ICO has issued non-prescriptive guidance on how website operators can meet the new consent requirements.

The methods for obtaining user consent can include using 'pop-up' prompts on users' screens that ask for consent to cookies when the individuals access web pages. Consent can also be obtained by using terms of use or terms and conditions that ask for consent from users when they first register or sign-up to websites.

Consent can also be gleaned from preferences that users choose when visiting a website. Website features, such as videos, that remember how users personalise their interaction can also determine user consent.

Website operators can also elect to display text at either the top or bottom of web pages that asks for consent and links through to more detailed explanation about their use of cookies.

The government has been working with website browser manufacturers in the hope that more intuitive privacy controls over cookies would be developed and be available to users through their browser settings. However, despite advances towards the development of new standards in this area, those technical solutions are not yet available.

A spokesperson for the ICO told Out-Law.com last year that it was up to individual organisations to work out which technical method is best suitable for obtaining users' consent.

“By next May we expect businesses and organisations to have clear information about the way in which cookies are operating on their websites and to be obtaining consent to set those cookies," they said. "Exactly how far each organisation will need to go in getting consent will depend on exactly what the purpose of the cookie is. Certainly, having widely available and easily understood information that is relevant to users’ is fundamental."

The ICO has the power to impose penalties of up to £500,000 on websites that breach PECR.

The watchdog has already intimated that a single breach could be sufficient to trigger the levying of a fine. However, it has also admitted that it is not likely to take action against website operators that use data analytics cookies, which measure the number of users of websites and how those individuals use them, if those operators have failed to meet the standards for consent for those cookies.

The ICO is due to host a press briefing today at which further detail about the way the watchdog is planning to enforce the new laws is likely to emerge.

Copyright © 2012, Out-Law.com

Out-Law.com is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.

What you need to know about cloud backup

Suspended Sentence

This is a mess. The UK is supposedly bound to enforce this policy. Trying to double guess what is allowed/not allowed is impossible. And most small operators using industry software haven't a clue whether they are spewing legal/illegal cookies or not. The only sensible way forward is for ICO to declare that enforcement (if any) will be in the form of a penalty notice detailing the offending cookies and suspended for, say, 30 days (or 100% discount) if the offending site is sorted.

Then we can rest easily in our beds, let ICO decide how they want to enforce it or not, and then do the necessary. Or nothing. Otherwise this law has the danger of creating much unnecessary work and waste while missing the point of safeguarding both the user and operator.

3
0

Behaving like Jonny Foreignor

Glad to see we are taking the same policy towards stupid European legislation as all the other victims of the EU - by basically ignoring it.

3
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: More unwanted stuff on websites

see that link at the top right of the DCMS site?

http://www.culture.gov.uk/

that links to a page talking about cookie?

http://www.culture.gov.uk/4902.aspx

Job done

Moving on, nothing to see here (except a crap load of badly worded fuckery from the EU which should have been aimed at browser manufacturers getting them to add better cookie controls but which got sprayed all over the place by accident.

3
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
NSA whistleblower to tech firms, Obama: 'Grow a pair!'
Ed Snowden: Email tracking grabs 'IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything'
 breaking news
Ecuador: All right, Julian, you CAN stay on our sofa - it's your human right
Minister and Wikileaker share cosy chat in tiny London flat
Google flings another £1m at online child sex abuse vid CRACKDOWN
See, see, we're trying, ad giant tells Daily Mail UK.gov
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
BBC lied to Parliament about doomed £100m IT monster, thunder MPs
Axed DMI ballooned and burst while watchdogs sang Kumbaya
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights