The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Google+ dying on its arse – shock new poll

Bet-the-company wager goes south

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Google has bet the company on Google+, but it’s dying on its arse. A study by traffic analysts RJ Metrics suggests that public engagement with the social network is weak, and failing to gather momentum.

"The decay rate here is very concerning," says the report, summarised here. "Users are less and less likely to make additional posts, even a few months after initially joining."

RJM found that a third of users who make one public posting never make another, and that the mean time between public posts is around 12 days. A study in February found that the social network had flatlined, with visitors spending three minutes a month on Google+ compared to 405 minutes per month at Facebook.

Google disputes the RJM study because it only measures public posts. Private posts made to ‘Circles’ are not included in the analysis. However, the Chocolate Factory has yet to release any data contradicting the studies.

The social network has been a huge gamble for Google. The ad giant has ripped up its privacy policies and redesigned its consumer services around Google+, effectively lashing the company to the Plus wheel. Google has even put major product launches, including Google Voice for Europe, on hold until the user interface is made Google+ compliant.

But the net gain is minimal; all Google may have succeeded in doing is cannibalising its own Gmail service.

The lacklustre support comes despite a high degree of coercion. Trek actor Wil Wheaton recently blasted Google for compelling his fans to join “yet another fucking social network they don’t want or need.”

Any suggestions for how Google can disentangle itself from Plus? ®

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

Well...

It doesn't need to disentangle itself from Google+. Everyone will have it and no one will use it. Much like pretty much everyone has a Windows Live Profile with their Hotmail account but no one uses it.

24
1
Anonymous Coward

I'm not sure the report is seeing the whole picture.

I suspect there are others, like me, that use Google+, even sparingly, but never use Facebook and don't have a Facebook account. The fact that Google's default privacy settings are private compared to Facebook defaulting to open will attract a different crowd.

Also, betting the company on it? I doubt it somehow, they are an advertising agency, Google+ is just one of many outlets for those adverts,

22
0

Re: Personally

No you idiot, the 'quality' you see on any social network is directly related to who you connect to on it. So it's your fault for having vacuous friends ;)

20
3

More from The Register

1,000 O2 staff chose redundancy over Capita
Betrayal, or just decent terms?
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
Now you can use your phone instead of your wallet at the ATM, too
Blimey, these little paper towels out of the vending machine are really expensive
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?
 breaking news
White Space wonga time: White House tips $100m into next-gen comms
Empty frequencies right place for tomorrow's mics, phones and fridges