How to simulate a light armoured vehicle
Thales Australia reveals tech behind trainers for eight-wheeled monster
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
The Australian Light Armoured Vehicle (ASLAV) is an eight-wheeled, 13,450-kilogram monster, which bristles with a grenade launcher, a pair of machine guns and a 25 millimetre M242 “Bushmaster” chain gun.
The ASLAV can carry six troops in addition to its three crew. Two of the latter ride inside the vehicle's turret, where the Gunner must be able to aim the Bushmaster in accordance with the instructions of fellow turret-dweller, the Crew Commander.
Australia has a large fleet of ASLAVs – more than 250 are in service – with many currently deployed in places like Afghanistan.
The vehicles get a lot of use, so it makes sense to use simulators for training. Thales Australia built the first nine such machines and has recently been engaged to build another set. When we heard that news, we decided to ask them how they'll do it.
The answers, provided by Tony Landers, Thales Australia’s Director of Business Development - Maritime & Aerospace, are revealing. But not too revealing – in order to write this story we had to agree to vetting by the Australian Department of Defence.
So what did we learn? Well … we expected the simulator would re-create the interior of the ASLAV, which indeed features a mock ammo belt for the Bushmaster and other similarly high-verisimilitude accoutrements.
What we didn't expect was Landers' insight that manufacturers of the various internal fittings of vehicles like the ASLAV now have half an eye on simulation market. Some items in the mocked-up interiors of the simulators are therefore identical to those found in actual vehicles, save for their simulator-ready USB interfaces.
The new simulators will also be joined, for the first time, by a desktop tool that runs on touch screens instead of a mock vehicle.

An Australian Light Armoured Vehicle
Which is not to say that assembling a simulator is as simple as daisy-chaining a stack of USB hubs: there's still plenty of bespoke electronics work to be done, which Landers explains in the context of the ASLAV's periscope. “We designed optical paths to LCD screens sitting at the end of tube that simulates a periscope,” he explains. “We built all the I/O and control it from the application software on the servers.” A team of nearly 30 spent three years building that kind of thing for the first nine simulators.
That team was helped by a Thales product called SETHI product that simulates a battlefield environment, animating enemies with artificial intelligence while creating a realistic 3D world.
The tricky part of building simulators, Landers says, is not necessarily the hardware or software. Instead, he says “the devil is in the detail, especially understanding the level of fidelity you need to teach the student the task. You could spend a large fortune simulating every element of a device to 100% accuracy, but that might not be required for training. You need to understand training design to understand what to build.”
For the ASLAV simulator, that means a “motion platform” that simulates working in a moving vehicle is not necessary. Students do get haptic feedback from the Bushmaster, but it is not felt that making the simulator rock and roll has a training benefit.
The new generation of simulators will refine the work from the first nine units. An important refinement will only be visible in the server rack that powers the sim. SETHI runs across almost two dozen servers which live in the same shipping container that houses the simulators. Landers said the servers run a mix of Windows and Linux, pack the most powerful graphics cards available at the time of building and house a number of virtual machines. The next-generation design requires just over a dozen servers, a number that has come down thanks to virtualisation.
Next page: The fine art of 'knobology'
COMMENTS
Aussie sims.
I remember reading in New Scientist of a military aerial combat simulator for the military... trainees were rather taken aback when kangaroos stopped hopping and started firing surface-to-air missiles at them.
It turned out that the developers had felt an urge to decorate the landscape with some native fauna to aid realism, and done so by reusing some existing assets, ie code for enemy infantry. Unfortunately, whilst they had changed the graphics files of the troops to resemble hopping marsupials, they hadn't updated all behaviours.
( Penguin - another animal exclusive to the Southern hemisphere)
Thanks for the comments
Thanks for the comments, everyone. I'm working hard on my proofing - we work without a net here in the APAC eerie. For those of you who wanted more detail , I'm sorry if the story is a little light-on. The story had to be vetted and the deep technical details weren't available for predictable reasons, but I felt the story worth a go anyway.
Savings?
I always wonder about some of these sims, considering how complex they are, whether they actually do save money over just taking a LAV ("eight-wheeled-thunderbox"!) out on the range for some training. I can understand it when it comes to jets, they cost a fortune, and if your trainee gets his low-level training wrong then the jet becomes a very expensive pile of wreckage, but it's not like an ASLAV is going to crash and burn!

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
What you need to know about cloud backup
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist