Feeds

New SGI CEO builds firewall around unprofitable sales

Inks $27.8m, 1.5 petaflops DoD deal with Uncle Sam

Top three mobile application threats

SGI tapped a new CEO, Jorge Titinger, back at the end of February to get the company back on an even keel, and in the wake of SGI's reporting its financial results for its third quarter of fiscal 2012, Titinger conceded that he has his work cut out for him because SGI, like many other server makers from time to time, has been focusing a little too much on revenue growth and not enough on the bottom line.

Revenues in the quarter ended in March were up 38.8 per cent, to $199.4m, but that was less revenue than expected and rising costs on all fronts plus another $19m in restructuring costs pushed SGI to a loss of $1.2m (still better than the $1.7m loss a year ago but clearly not what SGI had been planning for).

In the quarter, hardware and software products together accounted for $150.2m of sales (up 43.2 per cent), and compute products brought in $130.6m and storage drove $19.6m. Services accounted for $49.2m. SGI had two customers that accounted for more than 10 per cent of its revenues each, but declined to name them.

Across all revenue, the public sector drove 61 per cent of sales in fiscal Q3, compared to 19 per cent for hyperscale cloud operators (Amazon is SGI's biggest customer in this area) and 8 per cent for manufacturers. Cloud revenues were up 15 per cent in the quarter thanks to a big order, Titinger said on a call with Wall Street analysts going over the numbers.

Titinger and Jim Wheat, SGI's outgoing CFO, have identified nine deals worth a combined $87m that will book in calendar 2012 that have low margins that it has to ride out; most of the deals are for its ICE X X86-based clusters, Titinger said, and the deals have single-digit margins, which he was obviously not happy with.

"In the past, we focused on the top line and growing key customers, which has led to price pressure in some instances," explained Titinger. "The side effect has been an adverse effect on our margins, which will be in effect until the end of the calendar year. Therefore we are implementing a more rigorous deal review process."

The other thing that SGI will be looking at is what it can do to get paid a little quicker, Titinger said, because on some big deals it can take three or four quarters to get machinery qualified and accepted by customers.

SGI is in the middle of restructuring its European operations as well, a process that will continue until the end of the calendar year but which should make SGI's EMEA operations profitable by the end of fiscal 2013 as it eliminates around $7.5m in costs from the region.

Wheat said on the call that SGI, under his successor CFO Bob Nikl, (hired at the end of April) would be giving quarterly guidance from here on out instead of annual guidance as SGI has been doing for the past couple of years. To that end, SGI warned Wall Street that while it will begin shipping its next-generation UV2 massively parallel supercomputers, presumably based on Intel's forthcoming Xeon E5-4600 processors (which are expected soon) and a rev on the NUMAlink 5 interconnect created by SGI, in the current quarter, sales of the first-generation UV machines took a hit because everyone is waiting to see what the new machines pack in terms of punch.

Moreover, Intel's Xeon E5-2600 processors, which were announced in March, were a few months later than expected (something on the order of four to six, depending on who you ask) and that had an adverse impact on the ICE and Rackable system sales in fiscal Q3. All of this affected fiscal 2012 revenues and profits.

And thus SGI say that it anticipates sales of between $177m and $197m in the fourth quarter with a loss per share of 56 cents to 71 cents. For the full year, SGI is guiding to between $750, to $770m in revenues, down $20m at the low end and $30m at the high end from its previous guidance for fiscal 2012 and is happening in part because a large deal expected in Q4 fiscal 2012 has slipped into Q1 fiscal 2013.

The company now expects to lose somewhere between 75 cents and 90 cents a share for the full year, which is a lot deeper than the 15 cents to 30 cents loss Wall Street was expecting based on the previous guidance.

SGI has over 600 patents and its own supercomputing interconnect, the former of which you can bet Titinger is looking to peddle on the open market and the latter of which it may feel compelled to do, too, as Cray has done.

The plan is for SGI to be profitable on a non-GAAP basis in fiscal 2013, Titinger was squeezed a little to say on the Wall Street call, but he did not provide revenue or profit guidance beyond that. He expects to have his company review done soon and a battle plan ready for the call in August going over the Q4 fiscal 2012 numbers.

In a separate but no doubt related announcement, the US Department of Defense is shelling out $27.8m to upgrade the supercomputing facilities of the Air Force Research Lab as part of its High Performance Computing Modernization Program. The deal involves the Air Force installing a 32-rack ICE X cluster with 2,304 half-width, double-stuffed "Gemini" IP-115 system boards.

These blade servers are designed to mount one on top of the other – it's more snuggling back to belly than missionary, so you get the right idea – with a total of 9,216 Xeon E5-2600 processors from Intel running at 2.6GHz for a total of 73,728 cores. This box will pack a 1.5 petaflops peak theoretical performance punch. The Air Force is also getting InfiniteStorage arrays crammed with 6.72PB of capacity for feed this beast.

The Air Force Research Lab currently has a fairly new Cray XE6 super with 2,732 nodes and 43,712 Opteron cores on its current "Raptor" cluster, which weighs in at 410 teraflops. The lab also has an Altix 4700 Itanium-NUMAlink 4 cluster, called "Hawk," rated at 59 teraflops. This machine is a bit long in the tooth and it is interesting that the Air Force has not upgraded it to UV1; maybe it will get a UV2 machine, maybe not.

The Air Force has another cluster based on Appro International's Xtreme-X blade server design and using Opteron processors from Advanced Micro Devices as well that is rated at 27 teraflops, which is called the Utility Server in a very un-Air Force way. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
This time it's 'Personal': new Office 365 sub covers just two devices
Redmond also brings Office into Google's back yard
Kingston DataTraveler MicroDuo: Turn your phone into a 72GB beast
USB-usiness in the front, micro-USB party in the back
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Inside the Hekaton: SQL Server 2014's database engine deconstructed
Nadella's database sqares the circle of cheap memory vs speed
BOFH: Oh DO tell us what you think. *CLICK*
$%%&amp Oh dear, we've been cut *CLICK* Well hello *CLICK* You're breaking up...
Just what could be inside Dropbox's new 'Home For Life'?
Biz apps, messaging, photos, email, more storage – sorry, did you think there would be cake?
IT bods: How long does it take YOU to train up on new tech?
I'll leave my arrays to do the hard work, if you don't mind
Amazon reveals its Google-killing 'R3' server instances
A mega-memory instance that never forgets
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.