Feeds

Clouds rain money for Citrix in Q1

Some of it spills out of the net income bucket

The essential guide to IT transformation

Citrix Systems's acquisition strategy over the past decade has clearly paid off, with the company making yet another transformation and carving itself out niches in virtualization, network and application acceleration, and now cloudy infrastructure and now giving it a strong revenue stream.

In the first quarter ended March, Citrix had sales of $589.5m, up 20.1 per cent compared to the year ago period. Product and software license sales rose by 18.7 per cent, to $178.4m, and related license update and maintenance services was a pool of $264.5m. Software as a service product sales, anchored by its GoTo family of products for collaboration, puffed up by 21 per cent, to $120.7m, and professional services gushed by 32.8 per cent to $25.9m.

Spending was up on all fronts for the quarter as Citrix pushed sales and invests in new features for products and acquisitions, and net income actually fell by 6.9 per cent, to $68.3m.

Wall Street analysts didn't seem to be at all concerned with this during a conference call with Citrix CFO David Henshall and CEO Mark Templeton.

They, like Citrix management, had their eye on the full 2012 year and were more concerned that Citrix had raised its guidance for the year on both the profit and revenue fronts. Citrix now expects for sales to be between $2.53bn and $2.56bn, up a smidgen compared to the projections that the company made as 2011 came to a close; non-GAAP earnings are now pegged at between $2.75 and $2.79 per share, a nickel higher. The second quarter is expected to rebound, with sales of between $605m and $615m and non-GAAP EPS of 58 cents or 59 cents.

Henshall walked through the Citrix divisions, and said that the Desktop Solutions group accounted for $338m in revenues in the first quarter, up 17 per cent. Software license sales were up by the same amount as services for the desktop unit, which sells XenApp and XenDesktop application and desktop virtualization tools, among other things.

Henshall said that this part of Citrix had over 3,000 customer engagements in the quarter and close more than 100 XenDesktop virtual desktop infrastructure deals in the quarter with over 1,000 seats, with 26 of those deals having more than 5,000 seats. The company had 19 deals with its desktop virty products that had $1m or more in revenues each, and its wares are now being peddled by 1,600 cloud service providers who are offering desktop virtualization services.

The Data Center and Cloud unit, which sells the CloudStack cloud fabric, commercial support and add-ons for the XenServer server virtualization hypervisor, and NetScaler network acceleration appliances, had $100m in sales, up 28 per cent compared to the year-ago period.

Software license sales in the data center/cloud unit rose by 22 per cent, and NetScaler was up like crazy, with software license sales on the physical and virtual appliances up 46 per cent. In fact, 400 of the XenDesktop deals cited above had a NetScaler component. The NetScaler VPX virtual appliances, which you can run on your own x86 servers, had 600 new customers in the quarter. The high-end NetScaler SDX multi-tenant network acceleration appliances, which Citrix created specifically for service providers, had 20 per cent growth sequentially from Q4 and accounted for 20 per cent of NetScaler revenues, said Henshall.

On the SaaS front, sales were up by 21 per cent, to $120.7m, and within this, collaboration tools grew by 29 per cent and accounted for more than half of the SaaS sales in the quarter. Interestingly, Citrix is starting to get some traction with its SaaS tools outside of the North American market, and international sales rose by 50 per cent and accounted for 15 per cent of the SaaS revenue pie for the quarter.

Citrix exited the quarter with $983m in deferred revenues and $1.6bn in the bank.

All of this would make Citrix a very attractive takeover target if it were not for the fact that Citrix has a market capitalization of $13.8bn.

Apple, Google, Microsoft, or Cisco Systems could afford to buy Citrix, but it would be very hard to justify the multiple against revenues or profits that Wall Street seems to think Citrix should command even at the current market cap, much less after you add in the cash and some profit for the shareholders and the bankers. Citrix is too big to buy, and that is probably the best thing for Citrix customers because Citrix will just have to keep on keepin' on. ®

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
Pay to play: The hidden cost of software defined everything
Enter credit card details if you want that system you bought to actually be useful
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
HP busts out new ProLiant Gen9 servers
Think those are cool? Wait till you get a load of our racks
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
VMware's high-wire balancing act: EVO might drag us ALL down
Get it right, EMC, or there'll be STORAGE CIVIL WAR. Mark my words
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.