The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Google wanted Java 'partnership' with Sun

Oracle shows Google emails suggesting partnership or licence

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

The head of Google's Android development team, Andy Rubin, sent internal emails advising Google that the company would need to either partner with Sun or buy a licence to gain access to the parts of Java needed to make Android a success.

The emails came to light in today's court proceedings, as Oracle's counsel David Boies quizzed Rubin over a series of emails from 2005 and 2006. One email mentioned partnership or licensing as alternatives. Another mentioned using a Microsoft virtual machine to get Java working in Android or an alternative tactic to “Do Java anyway and defend our decision, perhaps making enemies along the way.”

Boies tried to use the collective sentiment of the emails to demonstrate that Google knew it was skirting the law with its eventual decision to build Java into Android using the Java API and many open source components, but without ever reaching a commercial agreement with Sun.

Rubin conceded in court that at the time of the emails he believed Google would need an agreement to use Java.

Earlier in the day's testimony former Google worker Bob Lee Mitchell said that while some code in Android's Java implementation and Sun's are identical, this may be because programmers simply have no choice but to use the same code.

The case continues, with former Google CEO and Sun CTO Eric Schmidt due on the stand tomorrow. ®

Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider

Re: Do no evil?

No way would Google walk away from Android! Google want control over handsets and tablets, so unless they develope a replacement for Android, they wont be walking away anytme soon.

4
0

I don't see the problem

Google probably did desire a partnership with Sun but decided a better solution was to work around Java completely. The fact that Sun / Oracle's suit eventually boiled down to a few fairly inconsequential patents suggests Google did a pretty good job of it too.

6
2

"Boies tried to use the collective sentiment of the emails to demonstrate that Google new it was skirting the law"

knew... not new.

4
0

More from The Register

Thanks, NSA: Amazon sales of Orwell's 1984 rise 9,500%
Citizens of Oceania bone up on the new reality
 breaking news
BBC lied to Parliament about doomed £100m IT monster, thunder MPs
Axed DMI ballooned and burst while watchdogs sang Kumbaya
Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
 breaking news
Author Iain (M) Banks falls to cancer at 59
Misses the release of his final work
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
It's official: 'tweet' an English word – not just in the avian sense
If the Oxford English Dictionary says it is so, then it is so
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news