Feeds

Oracle pops cork as cut-price ZFS array creams NetApp rival

Plenty more bang for your bucks in SPECsfs2008 benchmark

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

An Oracle ZFS 7420 storage array provides 40 per cent more performance than a NetApp FAS6240 at a $700,000 lower price point.

That's according to the SPECsfs2008 benchmark, which tests how effective an array is at servicing NFS IO transactions. The chart shows a selection of vendors' SPECsfs2008 IOPS scores in the fewer-than-1-million-IOPS arena. We're not looking at absolute SPECsfs2008 IOPS numbers here but at relative ones.

Oracle ZFS 7420 SPECsfs2008 chart

Selected SPECsfs2008 IOPS numbers

A dual-controller FAS6240 scored 190,675 IOPS, with an overall response time (ORT) of 1.2msecs. It needed 288 hard drives and an exported capacity of 85.8TB to do it.

Oracle's ZFS 7420 scored 267,928 IOPS, with an ORT of 1.31msecs. It was fitted with eight 512GB flash SSDs for read caching, eight more 73GB SSDs for write caching, 280 hard disk drives and a 36.3TB exported capacity. Oracle provide estimated pricing information for the 6240; it's not a requirement that SPECsfs2008 reports include this data, a curious omission.

The 6240's estimated list price is $1,178,868 which means every SPECsfs2008 IOPS cost $6.18. Oracle's own ZFS 7420 costs $430,332 which gives us $1.61 per IOPS.

There is a 4-node NetApp FAS6240 cluster, running Data ONTAP 8.1 in the SPECSfs2008 reports, that scores 260,388 IOPS and an ORT of 1.83msecs. It had 512GB flash cache in each node. That is far closer to the ZFS 7420's performance. Its Oracle-estimated list price is $1,606,048, which gives us $6.17/IOPS, almost four times higher than the ZFS 7420's $/IOPS number.

Interestingly the ZFS 7420 beats a 28-node Isilon S200 cluster, which cost $2,453,708 at a $10.63/IOPS cost. That suggests that the S200 better equip a flash booster as soon as possible. The Isilon clusters go up to 140 nodes and beyond; they are scale-out machines, scoring 1,112,705 IOPS with a 140-node cluster, far, far higher than any ZFS array can achieve.

Back in standard dual-controller array land, the Oracle ZFS array looks like a very cost-effective SPECsfs2008 performer and, by extension, a very cost-effective filer. Oracle is on a bit of a SPECsfs2008 NetApp-bashing expedition at the moment and seems to be enjoying every minute of it. Read Oracle bod Darius Zanganeh's blog to find out more. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
HP busts out new ProLiant Gen9 servers
Think those are cool? Wait till you get a load of our racks
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Like condoms, data now comes in big and HUGE sizes
Linux Foundation lights a fire under storage devs with new conference
Community chest: Storage firms need to pay open-source debts
Samba implementation? Time to get some devs on the job
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up Big Data
Solving backup challenges and “protect everything from everywhere,” as we move into the era of big data management and the adoption of BYOD.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?