Feeds

NetApp dips a toe into Flash Pool

New NAND stuff at Sunnyvale

Boost IT visibility and business value

NetApp has revealed plans to enhance its flash offerings and offer a single tier, flash cached array design with a sexy new name. Remember Hybrid Aggregates? They have become Flash Pools.

According to our close-to-Sunnyvale sources, we should envisage an array with a controller having Flash Cache – for read I/O acceleration – and the array enclosures having a mix of solid state drives (SSDs) and hard disk drives (HDDs). An aggregate will combine SSDs and HDDS into a logical entity. There will be up to 20 or so SSDs with around 25TB of capacity combined with a large number of bulk SATA drives holding 2, 3, or even 4TB in the future. We hear that there could be 48 of these in a single enclosure.

Writes coming in to the aggregate will be written into the Flash Pool and so be completed faster and be persistent.

This way a Flash Cache and Flash Pool combination will offer both read and write acceleration for random data. This is not automated tiering but caching with controller software sending random writes to the Flash Pool and storing random reads in Flash Cache. The Flash Pool idea has been called persistent virtual tiering by one source. We can expect it with an ONTAP 8.1.1 release later this month or in May.

Flash Cache and other NetApp NAND products will bring in eMLC flash and, it is claimed, this will mean higher capacity Flash Cache.

NetApp is looking at server-located flash as well. The word is that it will extend its Virtual Storage Console to manage flash drives in the server and, as NetApp has said before, support vMotion of virtual machines, high availability and disaster recovery. We assume these flash drives will be (or can be) third-party ones.

NetApp's snap technologies will work with Flash Pools and with the server flash product.

One more thing: the ONTAP virtual appliance, NetApp's array controller software running as a virtual machine, is looking set to be called ONTAP Edge and should be part of the ONTAP 8.1.1 release. It will run, we hear, in 7-mode.

That's it for now, NetAppers. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Docker kicks KVM's butt in IBM tests
Big Blue finds containers are speedy, but may not have much room to improve
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Gartner's Special Report: Should you believe the hype?
Enough hot air to carry a balloon to the Moon
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Dell The Man shrieks: 'We've got a Bitcoin order, we've got a Bitcoin order'
$50k of PowerEdge servers? That'll be 85 coins in digi-dosh
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.