Feeds

Whitehall needs to dump 'unacceptable IT' – outbound G-Cloud chief

Our cloud or the highway (please pick our cloud)

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Updated Outgoing government G-Cloud programme director Chris Chant has harangued civil servants and tech vendors telling them times are a-changing and so must they.

Chant, a career Whitehall civil servant, has warned his fellow CIOs they are “hiding behind the comfort blanket” and must change how they buy IT.

“That blanket is on fire,” Chant said.

According to Chant, CIOs like himself have been guilty for years of taking the easy path by signing expensive contracts with big IT suppliers, of failing to innovate and thereby causing end users to suffer.

“We have done the #unacceptable and thought we were doing a great job,” he said.

Chant is retiring as program director and leaving the civil service at the end of April.

Chant is currently a member of the Cabinet Office that is driving G-Cloud and the UK government’s digital change agenda along with recently promoted deputy government CIO Liam Maxwell and their ministerial chief MP Francis Maude. Maxwell moved up after predecessor Bill McCluggage left for storage vendor EMC.

There's no word on where he's going. A Cabinet Office spokesperson told The Reg The G-Cloud program will continue without Chant and "a decision on the role will be made in the coming weeks.”

After 37 years in government, Chant now reckons "#unacceptable IT is pervasive.” The hash tag appeared several times in his post and seemed to have been included deliberately.

Chant reckoned big tech suppliers should see the CIO’s smoking pants blankets and be warned that government IT has "changed", and is now taking a more “customer approach”.

“They can no longer rely on delivering poor service for big money and get away with it,” Chant said.

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) also got it in the neck. Their crime seems to be one of lack of awareness of the change, sloth, or both. We’re not clear.

“SMEs should embrace the opportunity they now have and bring their capabilities – speed, flexibility and low prices – to the government market. For the first time, government is ready,” Chant said.

SMBs are being held up by Chant and Co as the new hope for delivering IT to government, because they are more accountable and charge lower prices.

When Chant says government is changing, he means CIOs must manage smaller contracts with more frequent renewals so they can no longer opt for the “easy ride” of extending an existing contract or renewing what they have now.

Chant reckons IT procurement is becoming transparent, too, and with smaller contracts and use of “frameworks” it’s becoming easier to compare costs.

The framework he appears to be referring to is G-Cloud and CloudStore, the latter a vast catalogue of approved suppliers and services that is supposed to make it easier for government to shop for and buy IT and to pick suppliers.

CloudStore contains 1,700 services from 257 suppliers. While the government’s strategy relies on SMBs, the reality is the usual IT companies are represented – companies including Capgemini, BT, Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Microsoft. Further, many of the supposed services are still waiting to be assured.

The government has promised a new round of companies will be certified this month.

Underpinning all this is the shift to “digital by default”. Chant says government must design services around customers “whether that customer is a citizen in front of a web browser at home or one of our own staff working in an office”.

The government is also pushing departments to publish data sets under the Open Data Initiative.

Chant’s blog is the latest outburst from those inside the Whitehall G-Cloud to target government computing users as it seems G-Cloud is encountering at the least confusion and at most entrenched opposition from government techies.

Earlier this month G-Cloud Ministry of Justice representative Emma Gawen complained of “myths and confusion” surrounding its plans for security accreditation on G-Cloud. Among these, is a belief accreditation is "just unnecessary bureaucracy". ®

This article has been updated to include Chant is retiring.

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.