The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

SpaceX taps Texas for 'commercial Cape Canaveral' site

Hang in there for the tedious environmental review, Mr. Musk

Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime

More details have emerged about one of the sites that Space Exploration Technologies – better known as SpaceX – is considering for what founder Elon Musk has referred to as "a commercial Cape Canaveral."

The site in question is in the southern tip of the state of Texas, just outside Brownsville in Cameron County, overlooking the Gulf of Mexico, over which SpaceX's launches would fly.

Details of that site's choice come from the US Federal Aviation Administration's Office of Commercial Space Transportation, which published a bureaucratically monikered "Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS, Open a Public Scoping Period, and Conduct a Public Scoping Meeting" in the Tuesday issue of the Federal Register.

According to the FAA document, the EIS – environmental impact statement, for those of you not well-versed in bureaucratese – would study the suitability of the site for the construction of a "vertical launch area and a control center area to support up to 12 commercial launches per year."

Those launches, the FAA notes, would be of SpaceX's "Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy (up to two per year), and a variety of smaller reusable suborbital launch vehicles."

The notice also includes detail on the vehicles themselves. It describes the Falcon 9 as a 230-foot "medium-lift class" launch vehicle with a lift-off weight of about one million pounds, powered by "highly refined kerosene", better known in the trade as RP-1, and liquid oxygen.

Cameron County, Texas

Cameron County, Texas
(click for larger map)

The Falcon Heavy is described as a "heavy-lift class" vehicle that's essentially a Falcon 9 with two additional Falcon 9 first-stage cores "strapped on". Also 230-feet in length – or height, your call – the Falcon Heavy would weigh in at 3,400,000 pounds at lift-off.

The smaller, reuseable suborbital vehicle would be a Falcon 9 first stage with a maximum propellant load – both LOX and RP-1 together – of about 6,900 gallons.

In addition to the vertical launch structure, a variety of buildings would be constructed at the site, such as a hanger, warehouses, control center, offices, workshop, and possibly a "a launch vehicle preparation hangar and satellite fuels storage."

The Cameron County site is far from a done deal – and Musk isn't limiting SpaceX's site search to simply this spot. Back in November, he said that "several states and territories" were under consideration, including sites in Alaska, California, Florida, Texas, and Virginia.

We now know where the Texas one is.

In addition, the FAA is just at the beginning its EIS process, and is soliciting input from "interested agencies, organizations, Native American tribes, and members of the public."

Among the items that the EIS will consider are (take a deep breath):

air quality; noise and compatible land use; land use, including Section 4(f) properties and Farmlands; coastal resources; biological resources, including threatened and endangered species; water resources, including surface waters and wetlands, groundwater, floodplains, and water quality; historical, architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources; light emissions and visual resources; hazardous materials, pollution prevention, and solid waste; infrastructure and utilities; and socioeconomics, environmental justice, and children's environmental health and safety.

If you'd like to get in on the ground floor of the EIS – or are simply interested on how a federal agency crams both floodplains and children's environmental health and safety into a single meeting – drop by Brownsville's ITEC Center on May 15, 2012 at 5pm for the public "scoping" meeting.

While you're there, you might want to check out the proposed site yourself. Luckily, the FAA provides rather detailed directions. "The proposed vertical launch area site is currently undeveloped and is located directly adjacent to the eastern terminus of Texas State Highway 4 (Boca Chica Boulevard) and approximately 3 miles north of the Mexican border on the Gulf Coast," the notice reads. "It is located approximately 5 miles south of Port Isabel and South Padre Island."

That specificity also a hint of some impacts that the EIS may need to consider. From our reading of maps of the area, the site appears to be adjacent to the Boca Chica State Park, Brazos Island State Park, and Las Palomas Wildlife Management Area, Boca Chica Unit. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Anonymous Coward

Ah, just like Sim City

Stick the missile range in the furthest corner of the map, next to the toxic waste dump and maximum security prison.

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Why not just rent the proper Cape Canaveral?

Because the USAF are assholes, and they own the launch range. Even NASA has to go through them for permission and launch slots.

NASA has enough red tape, but the USAF goes "our mission is public safety" and uses it as a big stick. Instead of the usual mantra of "think of the children" they go "think of the public's safety" and use it to justify an absurd range of crap.

This is also not to mention a range tracking system that hasn't been upgraded since the '70s and sometimes takes 2 or 3 days of MANUAL switching around between launches. There's no automation, a bloke personally drives out to each tracking radar and configures some switches and cables.

Pretty much anyone technically competent looks at it all and starts swearing a lot, but they keep their mouth shut because KSC's the only game in town and you can't piss 'em off.

1
0

Stuff

Environmentally, rockets pad sites are a good thing - very little pollution, and the whole area stays 'au naturelle.' No other development at all. No-one wants a rocket dropping on them.

One problem with Texas is the oil rigs out at sea which need to be evacuated for each laucnh. However, there are not too many on the track, so that's probably OK.

Having this site would be useful for their reusable approach (fly back boosters) - launch at Texas and the second stage can loop round the earth and land back in Canaveral. I think.

1
0

More from The Register

Boffins find evidence Atlantic Ocean has started closing
'Embryonic subduction zone' that flattened Lisbon headed for Blighty
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
You've seen the Large Hadron Collider. Now comes the HUGE Hadron Collider
International Linear Collider ready to rock and roll
Headbangers have a gas, gas, gas in mosh pits
Boffins say heavy metal crowds behave like The Vapours
Hubble spies unlikely planet being born in hostile neighborhood
Hoovering a cloud of sand 7.5 billion miles from a tiny star
 breaking news
Jaguar to open new car-making factory in Blighty (virtually)
Britain still makes stuff, it's just not real any more...
New material enables 1,000-meter super-skyscrapers
Before you read on, see if you can guess how the new stuff will be used
 breaking news
China's second woman 'naut blasts off for coupling in HEAVEN
Wang and pals test the cosmic waters for Chinese space station
Scientists investigate 'dark lightning' threat to aircraft passengers
One stormy flight could give lifetime radiation dose
 breaking news
Chinese 'nauts prep for next coupling in Heaven, clear way for new station
Second woman taikonaut and pals test tech for China's own orbiting platform