The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Square kilometre array decision delayed again

Board may consider joint Oz-South Africa operation

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

The board deciding on the location for the Square Kilometer Array has once again delayed choosing between Australia and South Africa as the host nation.

Whether because the two proposed sites are so close as to present a nearly-impossible decision, or whether the political lobbying surrounding the SKA bids is has evenly divided the SKA board, the decision has been put off until May.

In a neutrally-worded statement, the SKA board said after its Schiphol (Netherlands) meeting that the board has “agreed to set up a small scientific working group” to report back in May.

While Australia has been pitching the climatic and radio-quiet superiority of its site, South Africa has been emphasizing the importance of the SKA as a development project.

The board’s statement hints that the opposing arguments may be resolved by accepting both bids, saying “it is desirable to maintain an inclusive approach” to the project, and it is “important to maximize the value from the investments made by both candidate host regions”. The working group has been instructed to “explore possible implementation options that would achieve this”.

Those investments include “pathfinder” builds both in South Africa and Australia – the 36-antenna ASKAP, at Murchison in Western Australia; and the seven-dish KAT-7 array in South Africa’s Karoo region, a precursor to its MeerKAT pathfinder array.

The two countries are also working on the vast computing requirements needed to support the SKA. ®

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

So, there's really only one important question isn't there?

If one site is scientifically superior, and the other has great development potential:

Is this a scientific project, or a social development project?

6
1

Re: Must be sited in Australia

they should have used comparethemeerkat.com to make the decision between the two sites.

5
0

Why build only one?

When for just twice the price (or less) you can build TWO?

I would hazard a guess that twice the telescopes would give your FOUR times as much science.

And everyone knows MORE SCIENCE is a good thing.

2
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
You've seen the Large Hadron Collider. Now comes the HUGE Hadron Collider
International Linear Collider ready to rock and roll
Headbangers have a gas, gas, gas in mosh pits
Boffins say heavy metal crowds behave like The Vapours
Hubble spies unlikely planet being born in hostile neighborhood
Hoovering a cloud of sand 7.5 billion miles from a tiny star
 breaking news
Jaguar to open new car-making factory in Blighty (virtually)
Britain still makes stuff, it's just not real any more...
 breaking news
China's second woman 'naut blasts off for coupling in HEAVEN
Wang and pals test the cosmic waters for Chinese space station
Scientists investigate 'dark lightning' threat to aircraft passengers
One stormy flight could give lifetime radiation dose
 breaking news
Chinese 'nauts prep for next coupling in Heaven, clear way for new station
Second woman taikonaut and pals test tech for China's own orbiting platform
Boffins hide cute kitty behind invisibility shield
No polarisation or microwaves needed, yet the cat and fish disappear
 breaking news