Feeds

Sales show tablets and Ultrabooks not rivals

Key battle is brand vs brand, not Ultrabook vs tablet

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

Intel's hope that it can take on and beat the tablet with skinny laptops - Ultrabooks - may prove unfounded, in the UK at least.

That's the conclusion to be drawn from sales value data released by GfK, a market watcher, which shows that while tablets took a greater share of over-the-counter sales in February compared to February 2011, notebooks' share of sales fell.

In February 2011, tablets accounted for 10.1 per cent of sales value. A year on, the share was 16.5 per cent, down from seasonal peaks of 24.3 per cent in November 2011 and 32 per cent in December 2011.

Notebook sales value, by contrast fell from 57.8 per cent in February 2011 to 54.6 per cent in February 2012, GfK's numbers show.

Netbooks went from eight per cent to 2.4 per cent over the same period, desktops from 23.7 per cent to 25.4 per cent. The numbers don't add up to 100 per cent due to rounding, BTW.

From all that, GfK analyst Dominic Ashford concludes that while "there have been suggestions that solid state drive-enabled, ultra-thin PCs will re-assert notebooks’ significance… it seems that the higher Average Selling Prices (ASPs) and differing functionality of these devices mean that consumers will not be choosing between a [tablet] and an ultra-thin but rather between brands and models within those kinds of devices".

So folk after an Ultrabook won't generally be considering a tablet as an alternative, and vice versa. It's not iPad vs Acer Aspire S3, but Aspire S3 vs MacBook Air, for instance.

That explains, perhaps, the rising share of desktop computers. To Ashford that suggests punters are keener to buy the products they need and not simply grab the cheapest kit.

"What manufacturers and retailers will need to achieve in 2012 will be matching new technologies and form-factors to consumers’ needs," he said, "rather than a race to the bottom in terms of pricing." ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
End of buttons? Apple looks to patent animating iPhone sidewalls
Filing suggests handset with display strips
Samsung Gear S: Quick, LAUNCH IT – before Apple straps on iWatch
Full specs for wrist-mounted device here ... but who'll buy it?
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Now that's FIRE WIRE: HP recalls 6 MILLION burn-risk laptop cables
Right in the middle of Burning Mains Man week
Apple's iWatch? They cannae do it ... they don't have the POWER
Analyst predicts fanbois will have to wait until next year
Reg man looks through a Glass, darkly: Google's toy ploy or killer tech specs?
Tip: Put the shades on and you'll look less of a spanner
HUGE iPAD? Maybe. HUGE ADVERTS? That's for SURE
Noo! Hand not big enough! Don't look at meee!
AMD unveils 'single purpose' graphics card for PC gamers and NO ONE else
Chip maker claims the Radeon R9 285 is 'best in its class'
prev story

Whitepapers

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup
Learn why inSync received the highest overall rating from Druva and is the top choice for the mobile workforce.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.