Feeds

Avere moves from accelerating filers to building them

Diversifies across the standing-reproach-to-NetApp sector

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Avere is moving from accelerating filers to building them, introducing its own Edge Filer plus filer migration and replication software too. It's starting to compete directly with EMC and NetApp NAS boxes.

At a press briefing in Sunnyvale CEO Ron Bianchini said; "AOS 3.0 is what we really wanted to build." He says it builds on the convergence of three trends; flash, virtualisation and cloud. Effectively v3 AOS turns an FXT filer accelerator into a filer, but Bianchini is not taking on filer giants EMC and NetApp directly. He sees the FXT EDge Filer being a single Ethernet hop away from the servers with the data centre or core filers being the other side of an Ethernet switch or router.

What Avere is doing is a v3.0 update to its AOS software that operates its FXT filer accelerator products and turns them into so-called Edge Filers plus adding Flash Move and Flash Mirror capabilities to allow customers to easily move, synchronise and replicate data between storage devices, from data centre to data centre or remote office, and from data centre to cloud.

FlashMove "enables live data to be load-balanced across existing systems, transparent archival to secondary storage, new storage and new vendors to be added to the NAS environment, and old storage which is past its useful life to be decommissioned. … FlashMirror replicates data on primary and secondary Core filers and keeps them closely in sync by sending updates directly and in parallel to both filers. FlashMirror offloads the replication-processing load from the storage and supports clustering to scale replication performance to any level required."

Avere reckons FlashMirror is the only storage-side replication product that works with all filer vendors’ products.

It is interesting to note that NetApp has blessed Gridiron as an accelerator for block-based access to its unified storage FAS arrays but has not and probably now will not bless Avere FXT products for accelerating file-based access to its FAS arrays. Avere's existence can be seen as a constant reproach to NetApp for inadequate read/write access performance unless users buy hundreds and hundreds of disk drive spindles.

AOS 3.0 will be generally available within the next 30 days. The 3.0 software release is a free upgrade for existing customers. For new and existing customers FlashMove and FlashMirror require separate licenses. ®

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
IT crisis looming: 'What if AWS goes pop, runs out of cash?'
Public IaaS... something's gotta give - and it may be AWS
Linux? Bah! Red Hat has its eye on the CLOUD – and it wants to own it
CEO says it will be 'undisputed leader' in enterprise cloud tech
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
Troll hunter Rackspace turns Rotatable's bizarro patent to stone
News of the Weird: Screen-rotating technology declared unpatentable
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.