Microsoft SharePoint exposes privates in sniffing hack
You've been X-Framed
Updated Sensitive information held in content management system Microsoft SharePoint is vulnerable to mining as the result of a newly discovered attack, security researchers warn.
So-called frame-sniffing attacks involve the use of a hidden HTML frame to load a target website inside the attacker's malicious webpage. Using the tactic, attackers would be able to read information about the content and structure of the framed pages.
Context Information Security said the hack relies on tricking a content management system user into browsing a webpage controlled by an attacker, possibly in response to a spam email. If the user leaves the tab open then the attacker can use frame-sniffing to run searches on SharePoint just like an internal user.
The security consultancy warns that the approach bypasses browser security restrictions that are meant to prevent webpages directly reading the contents of third-party sites loaded in frames. Guarding against the attack involves tweaking the X-Frame-Options on the server, so that browsers disallow framing. However this option is not applied by default on current versions of Microsoft SharePoint.
"Using frame-sniffing it's possible for a malicious webpage to run search queries for potentially sensitive terms on a SharePoint server and determine how many results are found for each query,” explained Paul Stone, senior security consultant at Context. "For example, with a given company name it is possible to establish who their customers or partners are; and once this information has been found, the attacker can go on to perform increasingly complex searches and uncover valuable commercial information."
Context researchers tested SharePoint 2007 and 2010 installations. They discovered that by default, neither version of the enterprise server software sends the X-Frame-Options header that instructs web browsers to disallow framing. As a result, firms that rely on both flavours of the enterprise content management systems are vulnerable to both frame-sniffing and click-jacking. Attacks are possible if the URL of a SharePoint installation is known, even if it is only accessible on an intranet.
After reviewing the vulnerability, Microsoft said it planned to change the X-Frame-Options in the next version of its content management software:
We have concluded our investigation and determined that this is by-design in current versions of SharePoint. We are working to set the X-Frame-Options in the next version of SharePoint.
Frame-sniffing can also be used to harvest confidential data from public websites, such as LinkedIn, that fail to protect against framing, according to security researchers at Context:
An attacker using a malicious website could build a profile of visiting users by piecing together small pieces of information leaked from different websites. For example, the product IDs of previously bought items from a shopping site could be combined with a person’s user ID from a social networking site.
LinkedIn said it was investigating the issue. We'll update this story as and when we hear more.
A blog post by Context explains the frame-sniffing attack in greater depth and outlines possible defences against potential attack, by adding the X-Frame-Options header. The post features a video that shows an attacker extracting sensitive information from a fictional corporate SharePoint installation.
On casual glance the attack might resemble a cross-site scripting flaw of the type that allows content under the control of hackers to be displayed in the context of a vulnerable website.
"It’s not a cross-site scripting attack, as no code is injected into the site (and it’s not an input validation flaw, like XSS or SQL injection)," Stone told El Reg. "It’s an information leak that allows certain bits of data to be read. Sites are ‘vulnerable by default’ in that they don’t have to do anything special in order for this attack to work – if they don’t protect against click-jacking then they’re also vulnerable to frame-sniffing."
El Reg contacted LinkedIn about the attacks. A spokesperson reckons punters might have to swap their browser:
We are aware of an issue with certain internet browsers that can enable a hacker to access information held on private Microsoft SharePoint sites, as well as mine data from public sites, by attempting to guess an individual’s personal information in “framesniffing” attacks. Our advice for concerned LinkedIn members is to contact their internet browser provider to ensure they are protected against such an attack or use an alternative browser.
Re: Suppose it goes beyond Sh(c)are point...
"I think if it works"
It does. It is widely advertised a mitigating measure against a wide range of browser-based attacks. On most machines I have 3 different browsers: 1 for banking, 1 for general browsing, and 1 for potentially dodgy stuff (the latest being usually something small and JS-resistant such as w3m, websurf, or the like).
a method to get at all that data that goes into SharePoint and is never seen again!
Beer, I want to raise my glass of T.E.A to the guys who did this.
Linked in replied?
"LinkedIn said it was investigating the issue."
Was that from an email that said:
"Thanks for contacting us and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
Thanks for informing us of this situation. We will take the appropriate action based on the results of our investigation."
I get one every time I am suggested to link to a dead person. (Jesus Christ*, Steve Jobs, etc.)
Sometimes they take action but it depends on who gets the email. While they took Jobs off of linkedin, they still want proof that Leon Trotsky (listed as "Party Commissar at Soviet Socialist Republic"**) is not a valid member. (on linkedin at http://www.linkedin.com/pub/leon-trotsky/7/620/bba )
*He died once and that counts.
** A title he didn't have while alive and didn't have after he died.