Ex-Google man laments Larry Page's 'single corporate-mandated focus'
That ads+faces conundrum turns sour at Chocolate Factory
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
A software engineer who has bounced between Microsoft and Google over the past few years is very disappointed indeed with his one-time boss Larry Page.
James Whittaker took to his blog to moan about the current state of play over at the Chocolate Factory and complained that Google is killing its business by obsessing over its rivalry with Facebook.
The developer bod joined the search giant in 2009, after quitting Microsoft. And he had nothing but praise to heap on his employer under the leadership of then CEO Eric Schmidt.
"No one had to ask me twice to promote Google and no one was more surprised than me when I could no longer do so. In fact, my last three months working for Google was a whirlwind of desperation, trying in vain to get my passion back," he lamented.
James Whittaker can no longer raise a glass to Google
"The Google I was passionate about was a technology company that empowered its employees to innovate. The Google I left was an advertising company with a single corporate-mandated focus."
Whittaker said that "technically" Google had always been an ad company, but compared that huge revenue slurp from the commercial world with that of a TV show, which carries popular material to lure advertisers.
He continued: "The fact that all this was paid for by a cash machine stuffed full of advertising loot was lost on most of us.
"Maybe the engineers who actually worked on ads felt it, but the rest of us were convinced that Google was a technology company first and foremost; a company that hired smart people and placed a big bet on their ability to innovate."
Under Page, who returned to the helm of Mountain View nearly a year ago, all that changed, Whittaker said, discussing his take on the Google co-founder's "social" strategy.
Google has repeatedly failed at building a social network to compete with Facebook. Some insist that Google+ is the answer to that how-to-get-845-million-people problem.
Whittaker brilliantly nails what appears to be, for Google at least, a pervasive rejection of its attempts to turn its business into a mighty, all-conquering and very sticky online property.
"Google could still put ads in front of more people than Facebook, but Facebook knows so much more about those people. Advertisers and publishers cherish this kind of personal information, so much so that they are willing to put the Facebook brand before their own," he wrote.
"Exhibit A: www.facebook.com/nike, a company with the power and clout of Nike putting their own brand after Facebook’s? No company has ever done that for Google and Google took it personally."
Whittaker, of course, has now returned to the Microsoft fold, so arguably he may simply have joined Redmond's breathless campaign to bitch about Google. But his blog post makes some salient points, already expressed elsewhere, about Page's plans for the world's biggest search engine biz. ®
COMMENTS
Just because _you're_ all jaded...
... doesn't mean he is.
Doesn't it strike you that a technology company which values employee input would seek to foster an environment where engineers think that - to quote - "their company is some sort of charity whose goal is saving the world through technology"? That perhaps the grunts at the coalface were actually happy under that kind of environment?
These haughty, slightly sneering proclamations about cliches don't add anything useful to the debate about google, or how it might be changing. While I am not fond of some of their user interfaces, they are a company I associate with innovation through allowing their employees to "play" a little with ideas which might pan out into a great, useful, collaborative tool for the world to use.
If Google are "Migrating" their focus to become A.N.Other corporate desk-filler, or otherwise starting to change the "feel" for engineers, they'll see a lot more like this guy leaving. It sounds like he was pretty useful too, if you take the time to read his post.
This is about more than "soundbites", "cliches" and "therapy speak" - it's about a company which had something of a geek "heart" deciding to change direction, and one man has decided to speak out about his disappointment. I for one applaud him for it - and will be enquiring via his blog if his motivations for writing the piece are down to Microsoft suggesting it's a good idea, rather than assuming it _might_ be the case.
Re: You just have to wonder, sometimes.
"I think its just americans in general. They all talk in cliches, soundbites and therapy speak."
Which in itself is a cliche'. Personally, I think it's more of a coastal thing. Midwesterners aren't full of that kind of guff. We have a different guff.
Interesting
An interesting blog post. But it does make me wonder... why did he choose _Microsoft_ as the place to go and work after saying Google was becoming too Corporate?
Personally I think most companies follow that path towards corporatism before they eventually collapse. Call it the natural lifecycle if you will.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
