What you need to know about cloud backup
The days before the Stratfor hack
It's unclear whether or not Monsegur and his FBI handlers knew about the Stratfor hack beforehand, but they were intimately involved in discussions about what to do with the stolen email and credit card data extracted during the hack soon afterwards. This discussion happened over Christmas - at the time the first tranche of leaked emails and credit card details were published and while the Anonymous strategy on what to do was still in flux.
Court documents reveal that Monsegur offered an FBI-supplied server as a repository for data extracted from Stratfor and that this offer was accepted. Hammond allegedly used multiple servers to store the leaked data. Chat transcript in the warrant reveals several discussions about using stolen credit card data to lease web servers to run as .onion domains from which Strafor emails could safely be reviewed. Eight unidentified co-conspirators in the Stratfor hack are listed in these various chat extracts included in Hammond's warrant.
Hacktivists clearly wanted the Strafor email haul to receive the widest possible audience, including providing an opportunity for journalists and others to review them. But chats in the warrant omit any talk of plans to turn over the information to WikiLeaks (an organisation members of Anonymous have gone into online battle to defend) which is designed to manage and publicise material like Stratfor's internal memos.
The extent of communication between WikiLeaks and Anonymous regarding the Stratfor leak remains unclear. Stratfor's own assertion that "some of the emails may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies", meanwhile, certainly seems much more plausible, especially if Monsegur (under the control of his FBI minders) had any say in deciding what was released.
It's not too extravagant to think that a bigger game might be in play.
The US department of Justice is rumoured to have convened a grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks, supposedly investigating the possibility that Assange might be charged under the 1917 Espionage Act.
Lawyers acting for Assange have argued that his extradition from Blighty to Sweden for questioning over alleged sexual assaults will open the door to a US extradition on possible espionage charges related to the leak of confidential US military reports from Iraq and US diplomatic cables. US army private Bradley Manning, a former Iraq-based intelligence analyst, faces court martial as the alleged source of the classified US documents.
If US authorities could obtain evidence to tie Julian Assange to some conspiracy involving the hacking attacks against Stratfor then this could pave the way for separate criminal charges against WikiLeak's founder.
News of Hammond's arrest over the Stratfor hack and Monsegur's betrayal of his former hacktivist chums was jokingly greeted by WikiLeaks. "So, Stratfor emails dumped to @wikileaks under the supervision of the FBI? Clearly constitutionalists who believe in the 1st amendment," Wikileaks said in a Twitter update.
Security consultants at HP argue against an overreaction against this week's bust.
Josh Corman, director of security intelligence at Akamai, notes that one set of high-profile arrests does not spell the end of Anonymous: "Anonymous is more Starfish than Spider. Decentralized organisations are very different than rigid hierarchical ones," he said on Twitter.
Corman has put together a series of informative blogs on Anonymous here.
Rik Ferguson, a security consultant at Trend Micro, concurs: "Anonymous isn't Sabu and Sabu certainly wasn't anonymous." ®
COMMENTS
Re: sounds like entrapment to me
It would only be entrapment if they suggested and facilitated the initial hack, just saying "you can put your data here" wouldn't be entrapment.
It turned out Hammond frequently went online using the Tor anonymisation service
So what? So do I.
I'd like to guess he also connected to Google as well - just as relevant...i.e not.
TOR is not illegal. Or are you saying anybody who uses TOR must be up to no good (just like the governments want everyone to think). "He uses TOR you know...he must be a pedo or hacker or something bad....after all, nothing to hide and all that", "See her in the burkah....hides her face she does...must be a terrorist, after all..why else would you do that"..
Use of TOR should be promoted as much as possible - something that is not helped by shitty innuendo about its use in articles like this.
Know thy enemy and know thyself
Going after a bunch of ex-spooks was guaranteed to prompt response from their still-officially-active chums. No surprise at all that someone's been cuffed already... he'll be singing like a canary if he wants to see any non-Cuban daylight over the next half century or so.
Idealism is a wonderful thing, but frankly the kind of people who can send you to Guantanamo aren't going to give a monkey's nuts about your rights... if you don't understand that, don't try going up against them. They may not always be fast, but they really don't forget, they really don't forgive, and their retribution is far more real-world...
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
