Tubular cells: Georgia Tech demos nano-scale solar fab
Solyndra dream lives on in miniature
The idea that got Solyndra into so much trouble – that a tube-shaped solar cell could be more efficient than a traditional flat design – didn’t disappear when its highest-profile manufacturer collapsed. It remains a strong focus of research efforts.
There’s a good reason for this: if such designs can be fabricated at a competitive cost, you get a device that can collect the sun’s energy from many directions instead of just one.
The latest research into tube-shaped solar cells comes from Georgia Tech (abstract), where researchers have grown semiconducting nano-rods onto the surface of carbon fibres. The result is a fabrication technique that eliminates the high temperatures used in today’s fabs.
The Geogia Tech crew have grown bunched titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanorods on carbon fibres, so not only have they created a tubular structure for harvesting sunlight – they’ve done it on a flexible substrate.
Next step, scale it up: Georgia Tech's
tube-shaped nano-scale solar cells.
This, the researchers say, means that if they can get the fabrication technique out of the lab, their collectors could be woven into materials as flexible solar collectors – for example, solar clothing.
The team has demonstrated – and compared – the efficiency of two different techniques for depositing TiO2 onto the nanorods. The first approach was to use dissolved TI to grow the material as single-crystal nanorods; the second was to etch the rods into bunched arrays using hydrochloric acid.
The nanorods were then dye-sensitized to create solar collectors.
These bunched arrays, the researchers say, provided better conversion efficiency than the unbunched configuration – 1.28 percent versus 0.76 percent (which highlights that this is early-stage research). The researchers say the greater surface area of the bunched configuration allows more of the sensitising dye to be absorbed. ®
That's not why Solyndra got into trouble...
The reason Solyndra got into trouble was not because of the cyllindrical shape of their product but because they used copper-indium-gallium-diselenide instead of silicon. At the time Solyndra was founded silicon prices were very high and rising quickly. Solyndra thought they could undercut the companies using silicon by using copper-indium-gallium-diselenide instead.
Unfortunately for them silicon prices fell dramatically and copper-indium-gallium-diselenide solar panels became uncompetitive.
Re: I may be missing the point, but...
Yes. But with current "single direction" solar cells, unless you have them mounted on a swivel to follow the sun, you get a sharp fall-off when the sun is not directly aligned with your cell. With this concept that will no longer happen.
If Solar clothing were made using single direction cells, the wearer would need to lay flat to get any benefit; this will allow for being up and moving and still getting a charge.
I may be missing the point, but...
The major advantage is supposedly omnidirectional collection.
The example application cited is “solar clothing”.
Wouldn’t it be dark inside the clothes?