Feeds

Apple wins battle in Motorola patent war

iPhone, iPad blocker unblocked, rules German court

The smart choice: opportunity from uncertainty

A German court has ruled that Motorola Mobility can't enforce a patent-battle injunction it won in December that would have prevented Apple's iPhone and iPad from being sold in that country.

The injunction caused Apple to remove those products from its German online store earlier this month, only to put them back up within hours, after the courts issued a temporary suspension of that injunction.

Monday's ruling in an appeals court, in Karlsruhe, Germany, as reported by Bloomberg, goes a step further, saying that Motorola can't enforce the injunction while the case is under appeal – which may take a year or more.

At issue is a patent related to general packet radio services (GPRS) that's at the core to the development of 3G technology – so essential, in fact that the patent is legally defined as being a "standard essential patent", subject to FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) licensing conditions. Motorola must license it at reasonable terms to competitors – not to do so would violate antitrust laws.

"At the current state of the proceedings, it is to be assumed that Motorola Mobility would violate its duties under antitrust rules if it continues to ask Apple to stop the sales," Bloomberg reports that the Karlsruhe court said in a statement.

And so now Apple can continue to sell its iWares in Germany during the appeal, and also attempt to reach a FRAND licensing settlement with Motorola without the pressure of lost sales.

Do note, however, that this is just one patent dogfight in which Apple is contesting with the handset maker for which Google began acquisition proceedings last August. Another spat has led to Apple having to turn off iCloud push notifications, and that case is wholly separate and still in dispute.

While all this may seem a wee bit confusing, one thing is clear: if Google had planned to use its $12.5bn Motorola Mobility acquisition primarily to wield a big ol' patent stick, that cudgel just became a bit flaccid. ®

Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications

More from The Register

next story
ONE EMAIL costs mining company $300 MEEELION
Environmental activist walks free after hoax sent share price over a cliff
Arrr: Freetard-bothering Digital Economy Act tied up, thrown in the hold
Ministry of Fun confirms: Yes, we're busy doing nothing
Help yourself to anyone's photos FOR FREE, suggests UK.gov
Copyright law reforms will keep m'learned friends busy
Apple smacked with privacy sueball over Location Services
Class action launched on behalf of 100 million iPhone owners
US judge: YES, cops or feds so can slurp an ENTIRE Gmail account
Crooks don't have folders labelled 'drug records', opines NY beak
UK government officially adopts Open Document Format
Microsoft insurgency fails, earns snarky remark from UK digital services head
You! Pirate! Stop pirating, or we shall admonish you politely. Repeatedly, if necessary
And we shall go about telling people you smell. No, not really
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.