Councils spunk £515m in 4 years on CCTV
Hey big spender, Birmingham
Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything
UK local authorities spent a total of £515m installing, operating and maintaining CCTV between 2007-11, according to the privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch.
It has released figures obtained from freedom of information (FoI) requests showing that Birmingham was the highest spender on CCTV with more than £14m, while Westminster spent nearly £12m. The group claimed that 428 councils responded to the requests, accounting for 98.6 per cent of the total.
According to Big Brother Watch, the findings show that Leicester has the highest number of CCTV cameras, with 2,083 in total. Other authorities with more than 1,000 include Fife, Wandsworth, Nottingham and Southampton.
The data also shows that:
- There are at least 51,600 CCTV cameras controlled by 428 local authorities in Britain.
- Leicester, Fife, Wandsworth, Nottingham, Southampton, Aberdeen City and Cardiff have more CCTV cameras than Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds combined.
- 18 councils have spent more than £1m annually between 2007-11 on CCTV, including Wandsworth, Bristol, Wakefield, Cambridge and Caerphilly.
Caerphilly has challenged this figure, claiming it does not provide an accurate reflection of the information it provided in response to the FoI request.
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch, said: "Surveillance is an important tool in modern policing but it is not a substitute for policing. In too many cities across the country every corner has a camera but only a few ever see a police officer. Despite millions of cameras, Britain's crime rate is not significantly lower than comparable countries that do not have such a vast surveillance state.
"There is no credible evidence that more cameras will reduce crime, yet councils have poured enough money into CCTV in just four years that would have put more than 4,000 extra police officers on the streets."
The five lowest spenders on CCTV were Arun council, which spent £250,000 between 2007-11, Mid Sussex (£462,000), West Devon (£737,000), Waverley (£1.1m) and Rutland (£1.4m).
The department of Communities and Local Government declined to comment on the findings.
This article was originally published at Guardian Government Computing.
Guardian Government Computing is a business division of Guardian Professional, and covers the latest news and analysis of public sector technology. For updates on public sector IT, join the Government Computing Network here.
COMMENTS
Caerphilly has challenged this figure...
..., claiming it does not provide an accurate reflection of the information it provided in response to the FoI request.
Or in other words, they should have checked their figures more caerphilly?
I'll get my coat.
And the results are...........
Britain appears to be becoming one of the least desirable places to live these days. Excitable Armed Riot Police ( EARPs as in Wyatt), almost 2 million CCTV cameras, the overpowering Nanny State.......
Are there any real statistics that all of these "necassary measures" are actually having any real influence, are serious crime rates dropping. Do people really feel safer with all this "security".
Is it really justifiable to spend 0.5 Billion Pounds on CCTV, wouldn't job creation, improving housing, securing industry contracts be better ideas for reducing crime. Crime is the result of a broken system, why not use the funds to repair it rather than covering it up.
I live/work in central Birmingham, and the last time I saw a real policeman on the street was when they were guarding Harvey Nicks during the "riots".
I tried in vain to stop our apartment building being covered in CCTV, no one quite understood it wouldn't *stop* crime, just capture a blurry video of it if the worst happened. Since installation, I believe the only successful case was tracking down who's dog doo was in the car park once. True Story.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
What you need to know about cloud backup
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything
