The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

LG 3D TV ads misled buyers, judges watchdog

Passive 3D can't be 1080p 'full HD'

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

LG has had is knuckles rapped by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) following a complaint made about its 3D TVs by consumers arch-rival telly maker Samsung.

The bigger of the two South Korean giants said LG was wrong to say the Cinema 3D TV, which uses passive 3D technology, could produce a "full HD 3D picture" or that its wide viewing angle would allow viewers to "sit where you want, how you want" and still get "the same immersive experience".

These claims, Samsung said, mislead consumers.

LG said neither Samsung allegation was valid, but while the ASA agreed with LG about the claim that punters can sit where they please, it sided with Samsung on the use of "full HD".

LG argued that "full HD" is a generic term for a device with a 1920 x 1080 resolution screen, and that was true even though its passive 3D TVs show two 1920 x 540 images simultaneously since both appear on a 1920 x 1080 screen.

The ASA was unmoved, and insisted that a full HD picture means not merely a 1920 x 1080 screen but also an image that's at least 1920 x 1080 on that screen.

The agency also said LG was wrong to state that the 3D picture was 1080p when, by its use of passive 3D technology, which interlaces right- and left-eye images, so the 3D view is, at best, 1080i.

LG was told not to advertise its passive 3D TVs using this terminology, and to make it more clear to consumers that its tellies use passive not active 3D. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Can't fault the ruling

LG were playing fast and loose and got called. At least the ASA were doing their job right.

4
0

Up to Full HD

You can just feel it coming can't you :-(

2
0

I think that 1080p is FullHD and 1080i is only HD ready. My first flat panel was labeled HD ready and could display 720p and 1080i, my current 1080 24p and is labeled FullHD.

For the active 3D you display a full picture for one eye, then display a full picture for the other. So you have the full 1920*1080 picture for both eyes. That's why the refresh rate is so high on those screens - it allows the picture to flick between the two fast enough so that you as a viewer don't notice (hahaha).

I think :)

1
0

More from The Register

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Proof the pen is mightier?
Sammy’s iPad Mini killer has a stylus to stab other rivals too
Microsoft lures buy-curious vixens, corduroys with a cheap fondle
Surface slab sales latest: Will no one rid Ballmer of these turbulent tabs?
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
Samsung plans LTE Advanced version of Galaxy S4
1Gbps download capability could stiffen drooping S4 sales forecasts
Apple said to be 'exploring' 5.7-inch iPhone
Who's the copycat this time, Mr. Cook?
Google Chromebooks now in over 6,600 stores
Major, worldwide retail push begins this summer