Feeds

Kindle Fire owners named keenest Android app users

Stats show tablet's usage storming ahead

Business security measures using SSL

Amazon's Kindle Fire has grabbed more than a third of the overall Android tablet usage activity in less than three months on sale.

So suggests Flurry, a maker of software usage analysis code built, the company claims, into "tens of thousands of Android apps, including many of the most popular" and able to give a statistically significant picture of the Android app biz as a whole.

Flurry's data suggests that in November 2011, the month the Kindle Fire shipped, the Amazon tablet accounted for around three per cent of app launches.

But by January 2012 the Kindle's share of Android app usage had rocketed to 35.7 per cent.

Flurry Android tablet app activity

Source: Flurry

That puts it on an effectively equal footing with the Samsung Galaxy Tab family. The latter's January 2012 app activity share is 35.6 per cent.

Back in the previous November, Samsung had a commanding 63 per cent of app usage. But it's not the only one to lose share to Amazon: Asus' Eee Pad Transformer and Acer's Iconia Tab family all saw their shares squeezed after the Amazon advent.

The total number of Android tablet app usage sessions in January 2012 was more than three times the November 2011 figure. Even the Galaxy Tab, despite a declining share of app launches, still saw the total number of app launches rise 50 per cent between those two months.

Of course, app launches do not equate to tablet ownership, but the Flurry figures show that Kindle Fires acquired over the Christmas period are being used - and used as much as older tablets with bigger installed bases. The first Galaxy Tab, for instance, shipped a year ahead of the Kindle Fire and has a much larger installed base.

Flurry also found that Kindle Fire owners are happier to pay to download apps than Galaxy Tab owners. "We found that the Kindle Fire drove over 2.5 times more paid downloads to consumers than the Samsung Galaxy Tab," said Flurry blogger Peter Farago. ®

New hybrid storage solutions

More from The Register

next story
4K-ing excellent TV is on its way ... in its own sweet time, natch
For decades Hollywood actually binned its 4K files. Doh!
Oi, Tim Cook. Apple Watch. I DARE you to tell me, IN PERSON, that it's secure
State attorney demands Apple CEO bows the knee to him
Apple's big bang: iPhone 6, ANOTHER iPhone 6 Plus and WATCH OUT
Let's >sigh< see what Cupertino has been up to for the past year
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Get your Indian Landfill Android One handsets - they're only SIXTY QUID
Cheap and deafening mobes for the subcontinental masses
Apple's SNEAKY plan: COPY ANDROID. Hello iPhone 6, Watch
Sizes, prices and all – but not for the wrist-o-puter
A SCORCHIO fatboy SSD: Samsung SSD850 PRO 3D V-NAND
4Gb/s speeds on a consumer drive, anyone?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.