Feeds

Feds: Apple, Google, Adobe, Intel, Pixar had wage-fixing no-poach pact

Lucasfilm also named: Says it has no need of techies

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Emails between Apple, Adobe, Intel and others are making them look bad as the US Justice Department mounts a case against them for setting up "anti-poaching" deals in which they allegedly agreed not to hire each other's people away.

The emails are part of the Justice Department's evidence in its class action suit that accuses the tech firms of agreeing not to steal each other's staff so that they could artificially lower employees' wages by killing competition.

The defendants, who also include Google, Pixar and Lucasfilm, are trying to get the case dismissed on the grounds that there was no conspiracy between them all, the agreements were all just separate deals that made no reference to each other.

A redacted document filed with the court before the scheduled case management conference on January 26 details evidence of emails and phone calls between the defendants organising the anti-poaching and anti-bidding-war deals.

The DOJ claims that in May of 2005, Adobe CEO Bruce Chizen emailed Steve Jobs forwarding an internal email from Adobe's senior VP of human resources about the recruitment of Apple employees.

"Bruce and Steve Jobs have an agreement that we are not to solicit ANY Apple employees and vice versa … Please ensure all your worldwide recruiters know that we are not to solicit any Apple employee. I know that Jerry is soliciting one now, so he'll need to back off," the department quoted Theresa Townley as saying in the email.

In April 2007, according to DOJ, Lori McAdams from Pixar wrote an email detailing a "gentleman's agreement" with Apple and referencing an existing deal with Lucasfilm.

"I just got off the phone with Danielle Lambert, and we agreed that effective now, we'll follow a gentleman's agreement with Apple that is similar to our Lucasfilm agreement," she is quoted as saying in the email.

In August the same year, Ed Colligan, then CEO of Palm, wrote to Jobs to refuse to do an anti-poaching deal, the DOJ alleges.

"Your proposal that we agree that neither company will hire the other's employees, regardless of the individual's desires, is not only wrong, it is likely illegal," the department quoted him as saying.

The DOJ goes on to claim that the agreements even covered employees that weren't solicited, but just applied for jobs at the rival company.

"The documents show that the explicit purpose of the agreement was to eliminate competition for talent, suppress employee compensation, and lower wages," the department said.

It also said that the defendants all referred to the alleged conspiracy by the same name, although the term they were using is redacted.

The department pointed out that senior execs from the firms all frequently sat on each other's boards as well, which would make it more likely that they all knew about the agreements.

The defendants in the case said that the DOJ's arguments were "both objectionable and meritless" and the department had failed to show that there was any overarching conspiracy.

"While plaintiffs distort and misconstrue the documents, the most that can be said of those documents is that they refer to bilateral business arrangements, conceived at different times in the individualised context of each company's unique collaborations and corporate relationships," they said in their response.

For those reasons, they are continuing to call on the court to dismiss the case.

If the court decides not to dismiss, Lucasfilm also said it wanted to be considered as separate from the rest, since it only had one agreement and that was with Pixar, which it often works closely with.

The entertainment company also argued that it wasn't a tech firm so it wasn't competing with the likes of Google and Apple. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.