Feeds

UK's solar 'leccy cash slash ruled unlawful

Govt goes back to drawing board on feed-in tariff cuts

Security for virtualized datacentres

Campaigning organisations and the solar industry have won their legal challenge to the Government's decision to reduce subsidies to businesses and homes which use solar panels to generate their own energy.

Environmental pressure group Friends of the Earth, which had sought judicial review of the Government's timescale for proposed feed-in tariff (FiTs) cuts of as much as 50% with solar companies Solarcentury and HomeSun, confirmed the news on its Twitter feed.

Climate Change Minister Greg Barker said that the Government would be seeking an appeal "as soon as possible".

"Regardless of today's outcome, the current high tariffs for solar PV are not sustainable and changes need to be made in order to protect the budget which is funded by consumers through their energy bills," he said.

The organisations successfully argued that the 12 December 2011 cut-off point for projects to which the new rates will apply was unlawful. The Government's consultation on the tariff cuts ended on 23 December 2011.

The "botched and illegal" plans had put thousands of jobs in the industry at risk, the environmental campaigner said in a statement.

However Simon Hobday, an energy law expert with Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.com, said that the ruling would not necessarily force the Government to change its future plans for the solar industry.

"As I see it, the Government now has two options - it can retain FiTs at the pre-review rates, or it can revise the timeframe for the implementation of the reductions. It may have to reissue the consultation itself, depending on the nature of the ruling," he said.

"What this decision does highlight is the difficulties being caused by the nature of the Government's current energy policy. The decision will likely affect the views of investors as to certainty of their investment decisions, so in that sense this rushed consultation has not assisted the Government in achieving its goals of keeping the costs of renewables subsidies under control."

The FiTs scheme was introduced on 1 April 2010 to encourage the generation of electricity through renewable sources , providing a financial incentive for surplus electricity generated that is transferred back to the national grid.

The Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) proposes cutting FiTs by more than 50% from April 2012. The tariff for schemes which generate up to 4 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity will be reduced from 43.3p/kWh to 21p/kWh if the Government is able to proceed with its planned cuts. Reduced rates are also proposed for schemes between 4kWh and 250kWH, and for scheme owners who receive payments for multiple installations at different sites.

Rates for larger installations over 50kW capacity were already cut to new entrants from 1 August 2011 after the Government's fast-track review of the FiTs scheme.

The proposed reduction would apply to all new solar PV installations in working order and licensed on or after 12 December 2011.

Climate Change Minister Greg Barker has previously said that the Government had "no option" but to cut the tariffs in order to keep the scheme within budget.

Andy Atkins, executive director of Friends of the Earth, said that he hoped the ruling would prevent the Government from rushing the changes through.

"Solar payments should fall in line with falling installation costs but the speed of the Government's proposals threatened to devastate the entire industry," he said.

"Ministers must now come up with a sensible plan that protects the UK's solar industry and allows cash-strapped homes and businesses to free themselves from expensive fossil fuels by plugging into clean energy."

Energy giant BP has also announced its decision to shut down its solar business after 40 years. The decision was taken after the business became "unprofitable".

A report in the Guardian newspaper said that Mike Petrucci, chief executive of BP Solar, broke the news to the company's 100 remaining staff in an email last week.

"The continuing global economic challenges have significantly impacted the solar industry, making it difficult to sustain long-term returns for the company," he said.

The company has made around 1,750 workers redundant over the last three years as it has gradually closed its PV panel factories, the newspaper said.

Copyright © 2011, OUT-LAW.com

OUT-LAW.COM is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
Radio hams can encrypt, in emergencies, says Ofcom
Consultation promises new spectrum and hints at relaxed licence conditions
Heavy VPN users are probably pirates, says BBC
And ISPs should nab 'em on our behalf
Former Bitcoin Foundation chair pleads guilty to money-laundering charge
Charlie Shrem plea deal could still get him five YEARS in chokey
NORKS ban Wi-Fi and satellite internet at embassies
Crackdown on tardy diplomatic sysadmins providing accidental unfiltered internet access
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.