Feeds

CSC faces £1bn write-off over botched NHS IT project

UK Govt not keen to pay for late patient record system

Build a business case: developing custom apps

CSC, one of the two remaining prime contractors to the NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT), has told its shareholders that it might lose an amount in excess of its £943m investment in the project.

The US firm and the government had been discussing amendments to its NPfIT work under a memorandum of understanding (MOU), which would have reduced its scope and value, but left CSC in place as a substantial provider of electronic patient record (EPR) systems to trusts in the north, Midlands and east of England.

In early December, the company said it expected to receive a further £1.5bn to £2bn from the government for this work.

However, CSC said in a financial disclosure that it was recently informed "that neither the MOU nor the contract amendment then under discussion would be approved by the government".

In the filing, used by US-listed companies for unscheduled disclosures, CSC said that this lack of approval could result in it losing an amount equal to, or in excess of, the firm's £943m investment in NPfIT, and that as a result it is withdrawing its financial guidance for the current year.

"There can be no assurance that CSC and NHS will enter in to a contract amendment or, if a contract amendment is negotiated and entered into, that the contract amendment as finally negotiated will be on terms favourable to CSC," the firm said. It added that negotiations with the government will continue in the new year.

Shares in the company dropped 9% following the announcement.

CSC's work implementing iSoft's Lorenzo EPR software is years behind its original schedule, with only a handful of systems in place across the north, Midlands and east of England.

The government said in September that it was accelerating the dismantling of NPfIT, with the expectation that in future trusts will buy EPR systems independently.

This article was originally published at Guardian Government Computing.

Guardian Government Computing is a business division of Guardian Professional, and covers the latest news and analysis of public sector technology. For updates on public sector IT, join the Government Computing Network here.

Build a business case: developing custom apps

More from The Register

next story
'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
And now a message from our sponsors: 'STFU or else'
Top beak: UK privacy law may be reconsidered because of social media
Rise of Twitter etc creates 'enormous challenges'
Uber, Lyft and cutting corners: The true face of the Sharing Economy
Casual labour and tired ideas = not really web-tastic
Ex US cybersecurity czar guilty in child sex abuse website case
Health and Human Services IT security chief headed online to share vile images
Don't even THINK about copyright violation, says Indian state
Pre-emptive arrest for pirates in Karnataka
The police are WRONG: Watching YouTube videos is NOT illegal
And our man Corfield is pretty bloody cross about it
Oz biz regulator discovers shared servers in EPIC FACEPALM
'Not aware' that one IP can hold more than one Website
prev story

Whitepapers

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup
Learn why inSync received the highest overall rating from Druva and is the top choice for the mobile workforce.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.