Feeds

Wi-Fi desk rodents break free from oppressive cabling

A mouse without wires! It's a Christmas miracle

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

A reference design for a wireless mouse has received Wi-Fi Direct certification, making it the first rodent to achieve such fame, though not, perhaps, the very first to ditch the wire.

The design comes from Ozmo, a company which has spent the last four years burning through $40m in VC cash trying to prove that Wi-Fi can do everything. The Ozmo2000 Wireless Mouse uses Wi-Fi Direct to connect to computers that support that standard, but don't have Bluetooth, assuming one can find such a beast.

Wi-Fi Direct is a peer-to-peer variant of the Wi-Fi standard, and Ozmo reckons it has shipped one million chips to companies who are embedding support into everything from Blu-Ray players to air conditioning units. Ozmo has a fair amount of intellectual property in Wi-Fi Direct, so along with Intel (who has a lot of IP in Wi-Fi) it has been pushing the standard as a direct competitor to Bluetooth.

The standard is a good deal less power hungry than its networking equivalent, comparable to Bluetooth perhaps, and Intel has managed to push it into some wireless video products so laptops can connect to TVs, but one has to wonder how often a direct peer-to-peer connection is necessary when one's TV is so often on the same LAN as one's laptop (and thus able to use DLNA).

For audio and other peripherals Wi-Fi Direct has had even less of an impact. A few sets of speakers exist, but it's notable that Amazon is listing the flagship Logitech model as "currently unavailable" (as opposed to "out of stock") while the Bluetooth variant is ready for shipping.

The Wi-Fi Alliance lists 424 devices as being Wi-Fi Direct enabled, and support from Korea is voluble with LG and Samsung being the primary cheerleaders (Samsung are responsible for the aforementioned air conditioner).

Ozmo argues that Bluetooth is unnecessary, and that consumer devices can reduce costs by supporting a single 2.4GHz radio stack. There is some truth in that: margins on a TV are much tighter than those on a computer, and it’s the incremental cost of Bluetooth which has prevented the tech replacing IR for our remote controls. But with so many solutions already available for connecting our kit together it's hard to see how Wi-Fi Direct will be able to carve itself a niche, even with the support of Intel, and a working mouse. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
FCC, Google cast eye over millimetre wireless
The smaller the wave, the bigger 5G's chances of success
It's even GRIMMER up North after MEGA SKY BROADBAND OUTAGE
By 'eck! Eccles cake production thrown into jeopardy
Mobile coverage on trains really is pants
You thought it was just *insert your provider here*, but now we have numbers
Don't mess with Texas ('cos it's getting Google Fiber and you're not)
A bit late, but company says 1Gbps Austin network almost ready to compete with AT&T
HBO shocks US pay TV world: We're down with OTT. Netflix says, 'Gee'
This affects every broadcaster, every cable guy
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.