Hidden Dragon: The Chinese cyber menace
'Any decent government does industrial espionage'
Analysis Cybercrooks and patriotic state-backed hackers in China are collaborating to create an even more potent security threat, according to researchers.
Profit-motivated crooks are trading compromised access to foreign governments' computers, which they are unable to monitise, for exploits with state-sponsored hackers. This trade is facilitated by information broker middlemen, according to Moustafa Mahmoud, president of The Middle East Tiger Team.
Mahmoud has made an extensive study of the Chinese digital underground that partially draws on material not available to the general public, such as books published by the US Army's Foreign Military Studies Office, to compile a history of hacking in China. His work goes a long way to explain the threat of cyber-espionage from China that has bubbled up towards the top of the political agenda over recent months.
The first Chinese hacking group was founded in 1997 but disbanded in 2000 after a financial row between some of its principal players led to a lawsuit. At its peak the organisation had about 3,000 members, according to Mahmoud. The motives of this so-called Red Hacker group were patriotic, defending motherland China against its enemies.
The hacking the US Embassy and the White House over the accidental bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade back in 1999 brought many flag-waving Chinese hackers together to, as they saw it, defend the honour of the motherland and fight imperialism in cyberspace.
This role was taken over by the Honker Union of China (HUC) after 2000, and the HUC later became the mainstay of the Red Hacker Alliance. China’s so-called “red hackers” attack critics of the state and infiltrate foreign government and corporate sites – among other activities. The phenomenon of patriotic hackers is far from restricted to China and also exists in Russia, for example. Russian hackers tend to make greater use of defacement and botnets to silence critics rather than spying.
Enter the Dragon
Over more recent years, different groups – which are involved in cybercrime to make money rather than patriotic hacking – have emerged in China, some of which are affiliated with the Triads. These groups are involved in running so-called bulletproof hosting operations, providing services for other phishing fraudsters and the like that ignore takedown notices that ethical ISPs would comply with - as well as various botnet-powered scams, spam and paid-for DDoS attacks for hire. "These firms did not target Chinese firms and were are therefore not prosecuted," Mahmoud explained.
Over the years patriotic hacker groups and criminal hackers have forged alliances, a process facilitated by the Chinese government and in particular the Peoples' Liberation Army, according to Mahmoud. One landmark event in this process was the defacement of Western targets and similar cyber-attacks following the downing of a Chinese jet by US warplanes in 2001. These attacks promptly ceased after they were denounced by the People's Daily, the organ of the ruling Communist Party.
The Chinese government began to see the potential of cyberspace at around this time and established a PLA hacking corp, as Mahmoud described it, featuring hand-picked soldiers who showed talent for cyber-security.
Mahmoud said that despite the existence of this corps the Chinese often prefer to use "freelance hackers" for "plausible deniability". "We can talk about hackers but it's better to talk about businessmen selling secrets. An entire underground industry has grown up to support cybercrime," he said.
There are various roles within such group including malware distribution, bot master, account brokers and "most importantly vulnerability researchers, whose collective ingenuity has been applied to run attacks against Western targets and to develop proprietary next-generation hacking tools", according to Mahmoud.
Small groups, including the Network Crack Program Hacker (NCPH), that research gaping security holes and develop sophisticated malware strains are reportedly sponsored by the PLA.
Western governments, hi-tech firms, oil exploration outfits and military targets have variously been targeted in a expanding series of so-called Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) cyber-attacks, commonly featuring Trojan backdoors, over the years. These operations have been known as TitanRain, ShadyRAT and Night Dragon, among others.
"It's sometimes difficult to differentiate between state-sponsored and industrial espionage attacks but what's striking is that all these attacks happen between 9am and 5pm Chinese time," Mahmoud noted.
Gaining access to industrial secrets is part of a deliberate targeted government plan, Programme 863, whose mission aim is to make Chinese industry financially independent of foreign technology. It also has a military dimension. "China sees cyberspace as a way of compensating for its deficiency in conventional warfare, for example by developing strategies to cripple communication networks," Mahmoud said. "That does not mean China wants to fight. Inspired by the ideas of Sun Tzu [author of The Art of warfare] China regards it as a superior strategy to break the enemy without having to fight."
North Korea is also developing expertise in cyber-warfare, running training schools that resemble those run in China. However there is little or no collaboration between the two countries, according to Mahmoud.
"The Chinese see their expertise in cyberspace as an edge they are not willing to share. That's why there is no collaboration with hackers outside the country."
The Wall Street Journal reported last Tuesday that US authorities have managed to trace several high-profile hacking attacks, including assaults against RSA Security and defence contractor Lockheed Martin, back to China. Information obtained during an attack on systems behind RSA's SecurID tokens was later used in a failed attack against Lockheed Martin.
"US intelligence officials can identify different groups based on a variety of indicators," the WSJ reports. "Those characteristics include the type of cyberattack software they use, different internet addresses they employ when stealing data, and how attacks are carried out against different targets. In addition to US government agencies, major targets of these groups include US defence contractors."
US investigators working for the National Security Agency have reportedly identified twenty groups of hackers, a dozen of which have links to China's People's Liberation Army. Others are affiliated to Chinese universities. In total, several hundred people are said to be involved in the attacks, some of whom have been individually identified. The information has helped to strengthen the US's hand in diplomatic negotiations with China.
The data also provides a list of targets for possible counter-attacks.
Bloomberg reports in a similar vein that China is engaged in an undeclared cyber Cold War against Western targets with the goal (unlike the Soviet-era Cold War) of stealing intellectual property rather than destabilising regimes or fostering communism.
Targets have included tech giants such as Google and Intel to iBahn, selected because it supplies Wi-Fi technology to hotels frequented by Western execs, oil exploration biz bosses and government and defence contractors. Chinese hackers stand accused of stealing anything and everything that isn't nailed down from as many as 760 different corporations over recent years resulting losses in intellectual property valued in the billions.
Next page: Paper tiger, hidden Trojan
An article full of "hackers" that aren't.
Notice how much of that "dark economy" doesn't involve breaking and entering computer systems, but is made up out of plenty of fences, brokers, and other middlemen, too. There's a reason thieves aren't called fences and fences aren't called thieves. Yet here we are, calling all persons doing things that aren't entirely legal "hackers" as soon as there's something with a CPU in it involved somehow. It's not very precise, nor very accurate, and it's not half as useful as it could be either. Worse, it gives legitimate invention a bad name too. That is a poor move in the race to stay ahead on the technology curve.
"Dark Visitor" really is so much more apt. Comparably US Congress has far less clue about what really makes the economy go (support cartels sue their customers for "theft" that ultimately makes them more money, for one; spreading that love world-wide, for another) than China, where many of the fabs are that are making American[tm] chip- and other designs. Trouble is, most businesses haven't the faintest just what their crown jewels are and consequently are more vulnerable than they think to copying of "intelectual property"*.
Knowing where your core business is and what constitutes the recipe to your secret sauce that helps you win that business is rather important to your business case. Thus this sounds like a wonderful opportunity to "integrate security" with clear business advantages attached.
Doing that also obviates the need to listen to vague handwaving about "cyberthreats" and other things that get various government flunkies' and -contractors' panties in knots so much it gives rise to an entire industry that nonetheless hasn't done much to alleviate the threat.
The more I look beyond mis- and abuse of the "hacker" term, the more I notice the IT security industry is made out of the same type of snake oil. A party that doesn't look at the field the same way can easily see opportunity where you've blinded yourself. And coming from a wildly different background, cultural, motivational, and otherwise, the Chinese have a clear advantage here.
* "IP" is also a horrible misnomer because it lacks obvious properties of actual property; like how you can copy it and not be deprived of it yet (unknowingly!) have its value affected, though whether the value goes up or down or sideways** is not straight-forward at all. Insisting it is property regardless means we keep on deluding ourselves.***
** Here: Lose some value in one market, gain in another.
*** Can't help but think some people do that knowingly, deliberately, according to some agenda.
You had me agreeing with you, right up until you used the word "racist." That word has been so overused by the PC lobby to squelch any and all cultural debate and enforcing their worldview that, like "think of the children" and "protect against terrorists", it has become a mockery of its original meaning, a symbol of oppression and reduction of freedom.
The moment you labelled LarsG a racist, you invalidated your argument because I'd wager big money that race was the last thing on his mind when he came up with his solution. Granted, it's a bit extreme, but then he's probably concerned about a potentially hostile and oppressive communist nation having the power to destroy our livelihoods. The fact that a large proportion of China's residents also have slanted eyes and yellow skin most likely never even entered LarsG's thoughts, nor does it have any relevance to the threat China represents.
I'd hazard a guess that's why you currently have 4 downvotes for an otherwise sensible post.
China creating loads of patents? Good!
Maybe the US will finally get around to reforming patents, then... When it is in their interest.