Feeds

Yahoo! shares! leap! on! asset! sale! gossip!

Plan to flog Alibaba and Yahoo! Japan stakes pleases investors

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Shares in Yahoo! got a bump yesterday on rumours that the company is considering getting rid of most of its Alibaba stake and all its stake in Yahoo! Japan.

Those folks familiar with the matter told Reuters that the ailing web firm could offload the Asian assets in a deal worth around $17bn, a step in the right direction as far as investors were concerned.

The shares climbed 5.82 per cent in yesterday's trading to $15.99, and had risen 3.19 per cent in pre-market trading today as of 10am GMT.

The Asian assets idea is the latest in a string of possible moves Yahoo! has talked about in an effort to revive its flagging fortunes.

There have been strong rumours that the firm could sell off part or all of itself to private equity investors. The idea of PE firms bagging a minority stake, leaving the same status quo at the top, was not a popular one with shareholders, particularly activist hedge fund manager Dan Loeb from Third Point.

Both China's Alibaba and Japan's Softbank, owner of the rest of Yahoo! Japan, have also been reported as interested in buying up some or all of the US side of the firm.

Alibaba chief Jack Ma has made no secret of the fact that a lot of his interest in buying Yahoo! stems from his desire to claw back the bit of Alibaba the US company has, so a deal to transfer back some of the 40 per cent of the Chinese firm would no doubt please him.

Although the deal would leave Yahoo! still holding a 15 per cent stake in Alibaba, according to the sources.

Bagging a few billion to sort itself out seems like a good idea, but the company would still have to come up with a plan to make its US business profitable, and most market watchers aren't putting too high a value on that side of Yahoo!

If the Asian asset deal is indeed worth $17bn, it puts the value of Yahoo!'s US business at a pretty paltry sum, considering the market capitalisation of the entire firm is around $19bn, which isn't a great vote of confidence on the management's ability to turn the US unit around. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.