The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Samsung gets a few days of Christmas

High Court nixes Apple appeal, Galaxy 10.1 in stores Monday

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

Breaking: Australia’s High Court has refused Apple’s application for special leave to appeal in the ongoing Apple-Samsung case.

Readers will recall that after the Federal Court in Sydney lifted the injunction that had kept the Galaxy 10.1 off the shelves, Apple immediately requested a stay on the orders so it could seek leave to appeal the Federal Court’s decision to the High Court.

The High Court then extended the injunction against Galaxy 10.1 sales until this morning’s hearing.

The High Court has now decided that there are no grounds for Apple to appeal is insufficient prospect that an appeal against the earlier Federal Court decision would succeed.

It’s not all over yet: as The Register understands things, this decision reinstates the status quo after the Federal Court’s full bench decision. Under that order, Samsung is now able to sell the Galaxy 10.1 Tab, but must keep meticulous records of sales – both of the device and of apps sold to Australians – ahead of the full hearing of the patent dispute next year.

However, as the Federal Court had noted in its early December decision, the short lifetime of products like the Galaxy 10.1 Tab (and for that matter the iPad) means the case is probably moot, except in financial terms. By the time the case is won and lost, both vendors will have moved on.

It being Friday, Samsung is likely to spend the weekend flying devices into Australia to try and hit the shelves as soon as possible. ®

Update: Samsung says the device will on on the shelf on Monday, December 12, with list prices of $AU579 for the 16 GB WiFi Galaxy 10.1 Tab, and $AU729 for the 3G version. ®

Cloud based data management

Ah!

Ah, the standard Yankee "MBA" best business practices, sue the competition with frivolous patent law suits, in order to maintain the monopoly and the profits and screw the end users for every cent they own!

8
1

A bigger pity

That Xerox didn't file one against Apple 30-odd years ago.

6
1

Sanity finally prevails...

But at what cost? At the end of the day Samsung has lost huge amounts of profits, Apple huge lawers fees, and as stated, in six - twelve months, both devices will be being pulled off shelves to make way for the Next Big Thing (tm).

All in all, both of them look like kids at the end of a schoolyard brawl - and all because of a few rounded corners...

It'll be interesting to see if Samsung tries to get damages out of Apple.... I hope to god they don't Im getting sick of reading these stories and realising *any* result from *any* development in the case effectively means *nothing* to the consumer.

7
2

More from The Register

 breaking news
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
BBC lied to Parliament about doomed £100m IT monster, thunder MPs
Axed DMI ballooned and burst while watchdogs sang Kumbaya
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
Silicon Valley digiterati to brainstorm at 30,000 ft
Nothing spurs creative thinking like 11 hours in a flying tube
Confidence in US Congress sinks to lowest level ever recorded
So why the %$#@! do we keep re-electing the same politicians?