The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Motorola parks tanks on Apple's German lawn

We're not FRANDs any more, argue MotoMobe

Motorola Mobility has gained an injunction against Apple sales in Germany, through careful application of owed royalties on previous infringements, but enforcing it will cost Motorola €100m in bond money.

That money has to be lodged with the court in case a later ruling overrides this decision. It's a lot less than the €2bn Apple asked the court to demand, and Motorola might decide not to ask for the injunction to be enforced until Apple's inevitable appeal has been dealt with, but it's still a victory for the company that aspires to being Google's mobile wing.

This is the same case during which Apple earned a default ruling by failing to turn up in court, but while Cupertino dismissed that as "a procedural issue" this time it's a proper ruling which could be used to prevent Apple products being sold in Germany.

The ruling, hosted and translated by patent watcher Florian Mueller, covers a patent which is almost certainly essential to the GPRS standard, and as such is subject to FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) licensing. But under German law the potential licensee of a FRAND patent cannot attach conditions to their licence, something Apple appears to want to do.

The conditions relate to possible previous infractions. Apple has been making GPRS-compatible phones for a while now and wants any historical infraction to be at FRAND rates while reserving the right to do without a licence if it can prove the patent invalid or inapplicable during the ongoing court case.

Those conditions have enabled Motorola to reject Apple's licence offer, and thus sue to get the injunction, in Germany at least.

There will, no doubt, be an appeal, so this is one more round rather than any decisive victory or conclusion, but it's a round we can award to Motorola Mobility. ®

Did Apple and IPCom have to do the same?

Just curious, did Apple or IPCom have to provide a bond for their injunction requests against Samsung and HTC respectively? Or is there a special reason for it in this case?

5
0

In the words of Nelson Muntz

HA HA

2
0

IF YOU LISTEN CAREFULLY...

YOU WILL hear the sound of how the mighty has fallen.

1
0

Shouldn't the headline be 'Google parks tank painted with Motorola logo on Apple's German lawn'?

Just saying...

1
1

Once again

besides a useless comment from someone who's only interest is to see his name on the net more times than Julian Ass(sad)ange.

Else good on Moto, but the fact that the Aussie courts didnt ask for a similar bond from Apple makes you wonder how many judges are fanbois and get free xmas i-Products in the post

1
1

More from The Register

Android is a mess and needs sprucing up, admits chief
Can Google really fix it? It isn't in control any more
New Lumia 925: This, loyalists, is the BIG ONE you've waited for
Nokia veep drills high-end master plan for El Reg
Android device? Ooohhhh, you mean a Samsung phone
Koreans nabbed nearly all the Q1 profits – more even than Google
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
MIT takes battery-powered robot cheetah for a gallop
Biomimetic big cat needs no power cord, just a walker