The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Even brilliant sysadmins need help plugging holes

External audits fix issues you didn't know were there

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

Sysadmin blog While we must never allow ourselves to fall into the habit of thinking that security is somebody else's problem, the time has come to accept that external help is required.

We accept the necessity of outside help in many other areas of business. Yet even when IT security audits are offered at no cost, companies are still reluctant to take advantage. Where does the reluctance to seek specialty support in IT come from?

The cost of a data security breach is already expensive, and those costs are still rising. Let's not forget about Sony, whose recent security issues have shown that data breaches can cascade into insurance issues as well.

Intel seems to think that the data security threat posed by missing equipment is a big issue. Meanwhile the FBI seems to think that reinventing the wheel is a potential solution.

Some sectors have it harder than others, but nobody is immune. Not even the biggest and the best. Data security breaches are now so common that we can regularly compile humorous lists of the top10 massive security breaches.

Confidence is not enough; data security needs be studied objectively and measured as qualitatively as possible. It needs the tender care of professionals. A computer science degree or whichever diploma is attached to the milled masses of sysadmins stamped out of polytechnics each year is simply not enough.

Security audits of your company need to be done by people bearing certifications like CISSP, GISC, and CCNP Security. Audits should be done by teams that have individuals sporting many years of actual experience in the field.

There is no ubermensch; the modern polymath is a myth. No one IT director, CTO, CIO, systems administrator or any other designation can or ever will know everything there is to know about modern IT. It simply isn't possible.

A large enough company could theoretically assemble an IT team whose skills covered all the requisite areas – I expect IBM, VMWare and the like have some pretty top-flight nerds – but even the behemoths of IT get themselves into trouble.

For all our skills, knowledge and experience, we are all of us still human. Working with a system day in and day out makes you more familiar with than than an outsider, but it also makes you more likely to overlook subtle quirks or rationalise bad decisions made by bodies further up the food chain.

Sometimes, it takes that outside professional to get the brass to accept you've been right all along. Other times, another pair of eyes really is important. More often than not however, the guy whose job it is to do data security 24/7 will simply know details about issues you simply haven't had time to learn yet, busy as you are dealing with everything else.

External audits also bring an element of "cover your assets" to the table. If it all does go horrible pear-shaped, being able to stand up in front of the judge and say honestly "we did everything possible, including bringing in certified external experts, and following their advice" makes a huge difference should a lawsuit arise. Increasingly, it can also lead to lower business insurance premiums.

If you have an internet connection, then data security audits have become a fundamental cost of doing modern business - no matter who your company is, or what you do. ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Latest Comments

> The free audits in question were from the ICO in the UK.

That'll be the ICO which has *such* a great reputation for safeguarding our data and privacy for these past few years...

Vic.

0
0

no such thing

As a free lunch or free audit and what about the weenie problem of Internal Security problems ( 80% isnt it ) duh

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Third party auditing

The people who audit your systems should be just that - auditors. They should have no interest in what particular tools you use to improve the situation, just that you do fix things.

What do you think would happen if you asked a builder to look over your house and give his opinion as to whether anything needs fixing?

And the best audits will be against clear standards. And the auditors come back and check again later.

Disclaimer - had no trouble with people offering free audits, but lots of experience of UKAS checking us against ISO 17025 and seeing the sums charged.

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches