The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Europe: warning, these Angry Birds CAN KILL KIDS

Rip-off plushies trigger alert

The Europan Commission has issued a stern warning: some Angry Birds could kill a child.

No, we're not talking about the insanely popular videogame but a set of knock-off plush toys loosely based on the argumentative avians and being catapulted into Europe from China.

Chinese Angry Bird toy rip-off

Nothing to do with Rovio's mobile game

Say the toy-testing Eurocrats: "The product poses a risk of choking as the suction cup is too small and may obstruct the airway of a child."

And that's not all. The plushie also "poses a chemical risk as it contains the plastic part of the suction cup contains 29 per cent by weight of bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)".

Chinese Angry Bird toy rip-off

The sucker is a choking hazard

The EC also sounded the alarm over an ersatze BlackBerry "mobile telephone". It's also a fake, but it also "poses a risk of damage to hearing because the A-weighted emission sound pressure LpA is between 93.1–93.4dBA. The A-weighted emission sound pressure level for toys used close to the ear should not exceed 80dB".

Chinese BlackBerry rip-off

Not a real BlackBerry

Take care in pound shops and car-boot sales, folks. ®

Thanks to Susan Watkins for the tip

Cheapo!

Dr Ashen is dicing with death with all the chemical soaked, knock off crap he comes into contact with.

2
0

And the difference is?

Printing a kitemark is only marginally more complicated than printing "CE" in sans serif letters. So I don't see how it helps... Even if you give each product a unique identifier, a knockoff can have the correct identifier and still be a knockoff.

But industry mouthpiece indeed. We'd prefer to fit some modern insulation -- cheaper, faster to install, thinner, and better insulating than the kitemarked standard. We can't as the BCO won't accept non-kitemarked kit, and it's indeed Foreign Made [the horror!] so it won't get the mark. Kitemark it and another UK company would go bankrupt, but really why would you want to support an obsolete products?

3
1

I came here to post this too. We need to get these to Stuart Ashen for immediate investigation.

1
0

Please note the completely effing useless "CE" sticker on the plushie.

Bring back the BSI Kitemark as a proper standard, and not a toothless old mouthpiece for UK industry.

PS, Rumours have it that the email system on the fake Blackberry actually WORKS (unlike the real thing).

3
2
Anonymous Coward

Chemicals, too loud, and an obvious trademark infringement.

0
0

More from The Register

Android is a mess and needs sprucing up, admits chief
Can Google really fix it? It isn't in control any more
New Lumia 925: This, loyalists, is the BIG ONE you've waited for
Nokia veep drills high-end master plan for El Reg
Android device? Ooohhhh, you mean a Samsung phone
Koreans nabbed nearly all the Q1 profits – more even than Google
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
MIT takes battery-powered robot cheetah for a gallop
Biomimetic big cat needs no power cord, just a walker