Feeds

Regulator unloads on ASX over buggy IT

Next time, make it work

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

In its annual review of the Australian Securities Exchange’s performance, Australian corporate regulator ASIC has criticized the exchanges handling of IT.

On October 27, the ASX suffered an outage that lasted from shortly after the opening bell through to 2pm. The ASX has said only that the outage was due to a “software glitch” which its backups were unable to cope with.

Although the outage occurred during the long process of relocating its data centre from the Sydney CBD to the northern suburb of Gore Hill, the exchange said at the time the move was not the cause of the problem – something which seems to be backed up by a scant explanation given to the Australian Financial Review.

The October 27 incident occurred after the period covered by ASIC’s latest review, which makes its observation that since the ASX launched an upgrade to its NASDAQ Genium-based Trade and Trade 24 platforms in 2010, “there have been nine incidents … which led to varying degrees of unavailability and disruption”.

Three of those issues, which occurred between October 2010 and March 2011, affected all users of ASX Trade, the regulator said, and “led to varying degrees of market outage”.

“Due to the number of incidents occurring in such a relatively short time, we had concerns about the robustness of the upgrades and the testing that was undertaken before the decision was made to go live,” the regulator writes.

Those concerns must have been exacerbated by the long outage in October.

The regulator also noted that it had concerns about the exchange’s “deployment resources”, and has imposed a requirement on the exchange to give trader’s greater notice of planned changes, even when the ASX expects those to be minor changes with minimal impact on traders.

The more demanding notice and governance requirements will be on show in short order, with a new “high frequency” trading platform called PureMatch due to go live next Monday. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.