DOOMSDAY 2012 MEGA VOLCANO 'UNLIKELY' - NASA
'There's no way to be sure though'
US space agency NASA, in its self-appointed role as 2012 apocalypse denier to the world, has issued another statement regarding a terrifying catastrophe which in its opinion will not befall the Earth and the human race.
This time the possible planetary catastrophe is the menace posed by gigantic so-called "supervolcanoes", colossal eruptions thousands of times more powerful than any in recorded history which could cleanse entire continents of life.
Basically that whole horizon blew up, melted and chucked itself into the stratosphere.
As usual we're indebted here to the knockabout press staff of the Goddard Space Flight Centre. They've put out their usual not-so-reassuring reassurance on supervolcanoes.
First up, super volcanoes are real, and have happened in the past with apocalyptic consequences.
Earth’s surface has preserved distinctive clues of many massive supereruptions. Expansive layers of ash blanket large portions of many continents. And huge hollowed-out calderas – craters that can be as big as 60 miles (100 km) across left when a volcano collapses after emptying its entire magma chamber at once – serve as visceral reminders of past supereruptions in Indonesia, New Zealand, the United States, and Chile.
The eruption of these prehistoric supervolcanoes has affected massive areas. The magma flow of Mount Toba in Sumutra, which erupted some 74,000 years ago in what was likely the largest eruption that has ever occurred, released a staggering 700 cubic miles (2,800 cubic km) of magma and left a thick layer of ash over all of South Asia. For comparison, the quantity of magma erupted from Indonesia’s Mount Krakatau in 1883, one of the largest eruptions in recorded history, was about 3 cubic miles (12 cubic km).
That's pretty serious: 230+ Krakatoas in one go, equivalent to hundreds of Mount Saint Helenses, smearing entire continents with deadly burning cinders, stifling ash and liquid hot molten magma - Pompeii repeated, hundreds or thousands of times over, followed doubtless by a disastrous global winter extended perhaps for lifetimes.
And make no mistake, something of this sort is pretty well bound to happen sooner or later:
Many millions of years could pass without a supereruption or many supervolcanoes could erupt in just a short period. The geological record does suggest supervolcanoes occur in clusters, but the clusters are not regular enough to serve as the basis for predictions of future eruptions.
What really seems to annoy the NASA spokespersons is all the 2012 hysteria. The message seems to be, yes, there are loads of genuine doomsday menaces out there but they probably won't happen in 2012 rather than some other year - no matter what the Mayan calendar long count has to say on the matter (which is essentially "start another long count", for those who wish to know).
However the space agency, in classic style, refuses to actually firmly say that there will not be a catastrophic mega-eruption next year.
Scientists have no way of predicting with perfect accuracy whether a supervolcano will occur in a given century, decade, or year – and that includes 2012. But they do keep close tabs on volcanically active areas around the world, and so far there’s absolutely no sign of a supereruption looming anytime soon.
There is of course one looming disaster facing humanity which is endorsed somewhat by the Goddard Centre. One of its many subsidiary organisations is the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, whose head James Hansen describes [PDF] global warming as a "global time bomb" with "potentially disastrous" consequences for humanity. ®
Since they aren't flying anymore....
After everything they've announced this year, how about we reassign the meaning of NASA? My vote is:
And I still want a "we're all gonna die!" icon.
We'll meet again
"We're now better equipped to survive that. Not all of us, but the human race as such."
Then, clearly, we need the Dr. Strangelove plan for survival. As I recall that involves going down a mineshaft with a specially selected group of attractive and eager females. It also requires super-human efforts on the part of the men but I'm willing to make that sacrifice. For England, you understand.
"Absolutely no sign" that a super-erruption is looming?
I thought there was quite a lot of evidence that the magma chamber underneath Yellowstone park is currently filling, causing the ground above it to rise. When that ground cracks, all hell will break loose. Of course that's not evidence that it'll errupt next year or in the next 100 years or 10,000 years, but it's rather less reassuring than "absolutely no evidence".
The geological evidence shows a fairly regular 600,000 year cycle for Yellowstone erruptions, and the last erruption was ... about 600,000 years ago. Odds-on the next erruption will be within 50,000 years meaning there's about a 1 in 1000 chance it'll happen in my lifetime.