The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

NetApp adds Lustre to Big Data line-up

Benchmark bonanza

  • print
  • alert

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

SC11 NetApp gunning for HPC and Big Data business with two product bundles combining its E arrays with Lustre, the open source supercomputer file system.

At the same time the company has teamed up with Whamcloud, a VC-backed firm "formed from a worldwide network of HPC storage industry veterans," to promote the Open Benchmark for Lustre (OBL). They say this should help customers compare suppliers' Lustre storage offerings.

My colleague Tim Prickett Morgan has a good run-through of the Lustre File System here. So let's concentrate on today's announcements.

First up is NetApp's High Performance Computing Solution for Lustre (HPCSL). This is said "to efficiently scale bandwidth and density" with 30GB/sec writes. There are FastStak and DenseStak (pdf)reference configurations with FastStak configured to optimise E5400 storage performance with high bandwidth and IOPS. DenseStak is configured to optimise storage density for maximum capacity in a 40U rack, using 10 x 4U E5400 enclosures holding five drawers of 12 drives each for a total of 600 drives.

NetApp DenseStak

4U NetApp DenseStak enclosure

Next up from NetApp is a Seismic Processing Solution (SPS) bundle (pdf). This has up to 1.8PB of E-Series storage in a 40U rack, along with Quantum's StorNext file virtualisation system. It provides 4.4GB/sec bandwidth from a 4U enclosure, and the system scales by adding these enclosures. A full rack delivers 50GB/sec read and 35GB/sec write bandwidth.

A fully loaded FastStak rack delivers performance of up to 100GB/sec sustained disk read throughput, 70GB/sec sustained disk write throughput, and 1,500,000 sustained IOPS.

Benchmark this

So why is NetApp promoting benchmarks for Lustre? We can infer that NetApp thinks its gear will perform pretty well but aside from this Eric Barton, CTO at Whamcloud, argues that an industry-standard benchmark is needed to provide common configuration guidance and performance reference points."

The OBL will provide, NetApp and Whamcloud say, "a framework that enhances configuration guidelines for optimised installations ... the benchmark will help to frame ... deployment decisions for improved efficiencies in areas such as bandwidth, efficiency, power consumption and floor space."

The initiative is conceived as an industry collaboration, encouraging vendors to identify benchmark configurations that are transparent. The benchmark data is then published for apples-to-apples€ comparisons of Lustre in different storage environments.

To join the working group and or to find out more contact: info@openbechmarkforlustre.org. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
AMD lifts the veil on Opteron, ARM chip plans for 2014
Not much action going on in 2013, though
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches