The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Top 500 Supers: Détente in East, West petaflops race

An arsenal of big iron deploying soon

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

SC11 For the first time since the Top 500 rankings of supercomputers was started back in 1993, the top 10 machines on the list are ranked in exactly the same order as they were in the list six months ago. But the HPC racket is set to explode, with multi-petaflops machines in the works using new processors and GPU coprocessors.

You can blame some of the détente on the arms race going on between the supercomputer labs in the United States and Europe in the West and Japan and China in the East on Intel and Advanced Micro Devices, which are both late bringing their respective Xeon E5 and Opteron 6200 processors to market. Yeah, yeah, El Reg knows that official launch dates were never divulged so you can't technically call them late, but let's face it, chipheads: Everyone, including your server partners, wanted these chips out the door earlier in the third quarter.

If these Xeon E5 and Opteron 6200 chips had got out the door and been put into machines that were in turn accepted by the big supercomputer labs, then the top-heavy part of the Top 500 list would have seen some churn. And maybe even more than one machine above 10 petaflops.

Fujitsu K supercomputer

Top of the flops: Fujitsu's Sparc64-based K supercomputer

But, as it stands, there is only one machine in the world that has broken the 10 petaflops barrier running the Linpack Fortran benchmark test, and that is the K super built by Fujitsu for the Japanese government. The K super is a massive beast based on Fujitsu's eight-core Sparc64-VIIIfx processor and a 6D mesh/torus interconnect called "Tofu" (you'd think it would be called Super Noodle or something like that...), and only two weeks ago the Rikagaku Kenkyusho (Riken) research lab in Kobe, Japan, said that it had attained its full capacity of 864 racks, 705,204 cores running at 2GHz, and attaining a peak theoretical throughput of 11.28 petaflops and 10.51 sustained petaflops on the Linpack test. This machine doesn't need no stinking GPUs and does all of its flopping with beefy RISC cores. It has also run out of expansion room, and that is why Fujitsu only a week later has announced its successor, the PrimeHPC FX10.

The FX10 super, unlike K, is meant to be a commercial product rather than a one-off built to test the concept for the Japanese government. The FX10 machine will be based on Fujitsu's own 16-core Sparc64-IXfx processor, which will run at 1.85GHz and deliver 236.5 gigaflops, a little less than twice that of the 128 gigaflops that the Sparc64-VIIIfx chip does.

The PrimeHPC FX10 machine will scale from 4 to 1,024 cabinets, sporting between 384 and 98,304 nodes. Fully loaded, this behemoth will deliver a peak performance of 23.25 petaflops. Based on the list prices Fujitsu announced, such a machine would cost $656m. Even in today's world, that is a crazy amount of money. And at an estimated 23 megawatts, the electric bill for an FX10 machine is going to be a doozy. Fujitsu things it can sell 50 of the PrimeHPC machines over the next three years, but they will not be fully loaded – that's for sure. Unless it can be shown to make Google and Baidu searches faster. The FX10 machines will start shipping in January 2012. (Did you hear that, Oracle?)

The next time the Top 500 list comes around on the guitar, hybrid CPU-GPU machines from Cray as well as PowerPC A2 machines from IBM as well as homegrown massively parallel machines based on MIPS and Alpha derivatives will be jockeying for the top of the flops charts, and K will stay where it is, much as the Earth Simulator massively parallel vector super built by NEC for the Japanese government did a decade ago. (This machine is still ranked number 95 on the list.)

But Fujitsu looks like it is trying to get into the exascale race, and it will be interesting to see the political storm that erupts when and if a US or European lab suddenly decides it wants an FX10 machine instead of some more indigenous massively parallel beast. It would be interesting to see NEC and Hitachi try to come back to the K party with vector engines of some sort after they left Fujitsu holding the K super bag back in May 2009 when the Great Recession was smashing their financials.

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Next page: Number two son

Anonymous Coward

Just in case...

Just in case Fujitsu's Super K machine decides to march out of the lab and take over the world. they've penned it in with some traffic cones and stripey tape.

John Major should be proud at his place in halting the march of our cyber-overlords

1
0
Anonymous Coward

"homegrown massively parallel machines based on MIPS and Alpha derivatives "

MIPS I'll accept.

But, as for Alpha: "citation needed".

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Fortunately, for the foreseeable future existence of mankind, the development of robotic limbs is as far behind the advancements in computational power as artificial intelligence.

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches