Feeds

Duke Nukem Forever dev slams unfair reviews

Panned game up there with Half-Life, apparently

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Developer Gearbox this week said Duke Nukem Forever was reviewed unfairly, with co-founder Brian Martel comparing the Duke's return to the classic Half-Life.

In an interview with Eurogamer at Gamescom in August - by which was published yesterday - Martel expressed confusion over the game's bad reception and insisted "everybody should really be thankful that it existed to some degree at all."

Duke Nukem Forever

According to Martel, modern gamers aren't used to adventures in the style of DNF, claiming the game "was what it was meant to be, which is a more old-school style game [using] today's technology".

He then went on to make the comparison to Valve's much-loved FPS epic.

"Would Half-Life today be reviewed as highly as it was?" Martel wonders.

"I think we all have a nostalgia and love for that particular brand. Obviously, Gearbox got its start working on Opposing Force so we love Half-Life. But would the current gamer have the same love for [it]? I think the same kind of thing happened with Duke," he said.

It isn't the first time Gearbox has made the comparison. Prior to DNF's release, top dog Randy Pitchford declared readers would lament any journalist's bad reviews, because "the last time I had a really solid experience like this was Half-Life 2".

The long awaited - and heavily hyped - Duke Nukem Forever landed on shelves in June and was immediately slated by reviewers right across the board.

Some were subsequently threatened by flacks that they'd be blacklisted for negative insights, although that particular PR team soon lost the Gearbox account.

Duke Nukem Forever

Despite disagreeing with the criticism, Martel did reveal it would be "taken into account". And he guaranteed it wouldn't take another 15 years to see another Duke game.

So there you have it, we will be seeing more of the Duke sometime in the future. Let's just hope it won't be another 'Fail to the King'.

You can read what we thought about Duke Nukem Forever here on Reg Hardware. As you can probably guess, we didn't think it was that great, either. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
The Fourth Amendment... and it IS better
Don't wait for that big iPad, order a NEXUS 9 instead, industry little bird says
Google said to debut next big slab, Android L ahead of Apple event
Microsoft to enter the STRUGGLE of the HUMAN WRIST
It's not just a thumb war, it's total digit war
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
A drone of one's own: Reg buyers' guide for UAV fanciers
Hardware: Check. Software: Huh? Licence: Licence...?
The Apple launch AS IT HAPPENED: Totally SERIOUS coverage, not for haters
Fandroids, Windows Phone fringe-oids – you wouldn't understand
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.