Feeds

Shale gas operations triggered Blackpool tremors

Deep-level drilling caused two minor earthquakes

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Shale consortium Cuadrilla says deep-level drilling caused two minor earthquakes in Lancashire, but they were so small hardly anyone felt them. The group's report, a Geomechanical Study of Bowland Shale Seismicity, which coughed to the tiny tremors, was published on Wednesday.

Cuadrilla says a quake of magnitude 2.3 on 1 April, and one of 1.5 on 27 May, were probably caused by fracking - or hydraulic fracturing. The group said:

In the Lancashire area of the UK, there have been many mining-induced seismic events at comparatively shallow depths of around one kilometre below the surface, that measured up to 3 on the Richter scale. The Preese Hall-1 well is more than 1.5 kilometres below the earth’s surface so events of similar strength are very unlikely to cause any damage at the surface.

Fracking takes place for a short but intense period, after which the heavy machinery departs and the "pad", or well head, collects the gas released.

Neither the quakes, nor their intensity, come as much of a surprise. Coal excavation causes hundreds of minor earthquakes around the globe every year - but shale 'fracking' typically takes place at a much deeper level: several thousand metres below most quake-inducing coal seams. The Lancashire shale bed lies 7,000 to 12,000 feet below the surface.

Cuadrilla attributes the seismic activity to the repeated injection of the fracking fluid - water with a trace of lubricant - into a pre-existing critically stressed fault, but says this is unlikely to reoccur. Still, Cuadrilla suspended drilling as a precaution.

All the same, the group accepts the conservative German standard for safe ground vibration, which sets the maximum magnitude at 2.6 and recommends mitigation measures if seismic activity exceeds magnitude 1.7 - after which the group should stop water injection and reduce pressure.

A more detailed explanation can be found here. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
SCREW YOU, Russia! NASA lobs $6.8bn at Boeing AND SpaceX to run space station taxis
Musk charging nearly half as much as Boeing for crew trips
Boffins say they've got Lithium batteries the wrong way around
Surprises at the nano-scale mean our ideas about how they charge could be all wrong
Thought that last dinosaur was BIG? This one's bloody ENORMOUS
Weighed several adult elephants, contend boffins
Europe prepares to INVADE comet: Rosetta landing site chosen
No word yet on whether backup site is labelled 'K'
India's MOM Mars mission makes final course correction
Mangalyaan probe will feel the burn of orbital insertion on September 24th
Cracked it - Vulture 2 power podule fires servos for 4 HOURS
Pixhawk avionics juice issue sorted, onwards to Spaceport America
City hidden beneath England's Stonehenge had HUMAN ABATTOIR. And a pub
Boozed-up ancients drank beer before tearing corpses apart
'Duck face' selfie in SPAAAACE: Rosetta's snap with bird comet
Probe prepares to make first landing on fast-moving rock
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.