The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Google and co join gov's identity marketplace

Midata: A lucrative ID trade-off

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Google is among 26 companies that have signed up to the government's latest effort to create a British business sector out of the handling of private data and an individual's online identity.

data_eye_midata_logo

The logo depicts the comforting eye of
Sauron midata...

UK.gov prefers to cast this agenda as part of its push to make the government and private companies more transparent about the information they hold on taxpayers and consumers.

The Business, Innovation and Skills department launched "midata", which is based on a voluntary partnership, today and said that consumers in Blighty would soon be able to access information held by the likes of British Gas, MasterCard and Google via online "personal data inventories" (PDIs).

According to BIS, companies that sign up to midata would benefit from more information being shared by consumers.

"As customers get used to updating and managing preferences and permissions, they are more likely to opt in rather than out of marketing communications," said the department in a document outlining the "potential benefits" to business.

BIS claimed that consumers would be "empowered" by such data sharing online.

But the agenda also feeds heavily into the Cabinet Office's plan to offload identity-handling onto the private sector.

"Under the government's proposed ID assurance scheme, a market for providers of identity services will be created. Individuals will be able to take these 'tokens of identity' with them from organisation to organisation," said BIS.

"The same approach can be extended to other tokens of verification, for example that this person 'has this credit score', or 'is entitled to these benefits'. These tokens can reduce risk and streamline sales processes."

Unsurprisingly, the government – anxious not to see a backlash from privacy advocates accusing it of mounting its own infant ID card system, sans the card – reasserted that it won't have a huge data repository in Whitehall that holds all of this information.

"Midata will not create any central databases or data portals," said BIS.

"Any data that companies pass back to customers will passed to individuals and no one else. The government won't see or have access to any of the data that is released. Releasing data back to individuals is a matter for companies and their customers alone."

It will make the first PDIs available in 2012.

"Consumer data is an incredibly valuable commodity and the amount of data kept and used is set to grow as people increasingly use online and digital services," said watchdog Consumer Focus.

"This data should not just benefit the businesses and services who collect it. Midata is an important initiative that could help people retrieve and reuse their own personal data for their own benefit.

‘"But there is also the risk of serious consumer detriment if data is lost, leaked, misused or stolen. Protecting consumer data will be the pass or fail criteria for this initiative."

Meanwhile, Information Commissioner Christopher Graham said he hoped the new scheme would operate within the current law.

“It goes without saying that privacy and data security principles must continue to be upheld and I’m pleased that consumer data security has been a key strand from the outset," he said.

"I look forward to continuing to work with the government and businesses to ensure the scheme complies with the Data Protection Act."

As we revealed yesterday, the government's £10m-and-counting ID assurance scheme will almost certainly be subjected to primary legislation. But it remains to be seen whether such a new law, if passed in Parliament, would include provisions for the Midata marketplace now in play. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Calling all mooncalves

For a brief while there yesterday, there was a story on the BIS website called "The midata vision of consumer empowerment". It's gone now.

But there is a press release, available at http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/Detail.aspx?ReleaseID=421869&NewsAreaID=2

And Ed Davey, the minister responsible, has blogged on midata at http://blogs.bis.gov.uk/blog/2011/11/03/giving-consumers-the-midata-touch/#comment-2054

1. The claim is made repeatedly that midata empowers people and that midata gives them unprecedented control over the use of their personal data. How? BIS give no answer. Suppose you fill your "personal data inventory" (PDI) with a lot of your Lloyds Bank data (Lloyds are one of the midata partners) and then pass a selection of that data to British Gas (another midata partner), perhaps to open an account, how can you control what British Gas do with the data? You can't. You get no new powers with a PDI than you had before there were any PDIs. There is no sense in which you are newly empowered. The BIS press release is misleading.

2. There are unexplained claims that having a PDI will help you to make decisions. Unexplained, at least, in the BIS press release. But there is an explanation here -- http://forum.no2id.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=35514 The purveyors of PDIs, previously known as PDSs, believe that analysing the data in your PDI will help you to decide who to marry, see particularly comments at 08 Jun 2011 18:19:11

3. midata is clearly closely related to the Cabinet Office's Identity Assurance scheme (IdA) as noted by ElReg. At least it should be. But on Monday 31 October 2011, the Cabinet Office held an IdA conference. The impression was that they were in control. There was no mention of midata, which appeared, unheralded, three days later on Thursday 3 November. Is midata, as FatsBrannigan asks, and so do I, a freelance operation by BIS? Is the Cabinet Office in control?

4. Ed Davey is Lib Dem MP for Kingston and Surbiton. Here he is claiming that the UK economy can be expanded by making it easier for people to give their data to marketers in a handily formatted container designed to suit them. Socially dodgy. Economically dodgy. Politically dodgy.

4
0

No. Just no

5
1
Anonymous Coward

I posted some similar awkward questions to Ed Davey's blog posting

The moderator hasn't deemed them fit for publication yet.

My final, slightly mischievous, question to Mr Davey was - had they done a trademark search on midata before going live? If not, I hope they've included a budget item for lawyers.

1
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
NSA PRISM snoop-gate: Won't someone think of the children, wails Apple
10,000 things probed, mostly about missing kids, Alzheimer patients, we're told
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
Speech-to-text drives motorists to distraction
Will talking to you mean I crash into that car up ahead, Siri?
DHS warns of vulns in hospital medical equipment
Has your doctor's anasthesia machine been hacked?
 breaking news
'BadNews is malware' says outfit that found it
Google says code harmless but Lookout says code base is evolving
Panda-peddlers cuffed for chess gambling gambit
More porridge on the menu for Chinese coders after second offence
 breaking news
Yes, maybe we should keep hackers in the clink for YEARS, mulls EU
Watch out black hats, they just might throw away the key
Internet fraud still stings suckers
Australians twice as gullible as Americans