Feeds

Google splurges $1.5bn on acquisitions in nine months

Not including the $12.5bn it'll spunk on Motorola

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Google has managed to spend around $1.5bn on acquisitions in the last nine months, including $265m in the month of September alone, according to a regulatory filing.

The official form for its quarterly earnings for the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also detailed that the Chocolate Factory had splurged $151m on restaurant review guide Zagat and $114m on the German Groupon-clone Daily Deals.

The spends were just two of 56 "acquisitions and purchases of intangible assets" the web giant made in the nine months to the end of September, although the other 54 "were not material individually or in aggregate".

The company also bought ITA, the flight information software company, in the last nine months, which according to its fact sheet on the acquisition cost $700m, although the figure is not included in the filing.

The total value the internet behemoth ascribes to patents and developed technology it got from all its acquisitions is $407m.

Taking out those patents from ITA, Zagat and Daily Deals leaves $236m ascribed to "other", which presumably includes the value of the 2,053 patents it acquired from IBM in two deals over the period. A Google spokesperson had not returned a request for comment on this at the time of publication.

Of course none of these hefty outgoings include the promise of $12.5bn in cash for Motorola Mobility that Google entered into in August, a merger that the company expects to close by the end of this year or early next, subject to approvals.

However, in case you might be getting worried about the poor old monolith's cash-flow, you needn't, since the same filing also shows it is looking pretty good on that front. Google lists $4.2bn in readies sitting in the bank and $6.4bn in cash equivalents (government bonds, securities and the like), not to mention a cool $42.6bn in marketable securities (securities that can generally be converted into cash quickly at a reasonable price). ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.