Feeds

Schooner adds asynch replication to MySQL appliance

Remote disaster recovery

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Schooner Information Technology, which makes a line of virtual machine appliances that goose the performance of MySQL databases and Memcached web cache programs by using CPU threads, cores and solid state disks in modern x86-based servers, has tweaked its MySQL appliance to give it better disaster recovery.

Schooner came out of stealth back in April 2009 with a set of hardware appliances based on IBM's System X servers equipped with Intel flash storage, which delivers about a six to eight factro performance boost over servers running off-the-shelf versions of MySQL and Memcached (and not using flash storage).

But the hardware was almost irrelevant. What was key is a set of software originally called the Data Fabric API and now called the Schooner Operating Environment, which creates very efficient and thread-aware userspace for Schooner's own blackbox, reverse-engineered, Memecached clone or Oracle's MySQL Enterprise Edition database (which it licenses from Oracle) on top of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 and 5.5.

In February this year, Schooner ditched the IBM hardware and packaged up these two products as virtual machine appliances, because flash memory was now common and customers wanted to use their servers, not the single box sold by IBM. They are now called SchoonerSQL and Membrain.

In April of this year, Schooner beefed up its version of the MySQL database (which includes a modified version of the InnoDB database engine that Oracle also controls) with a feature called Active Cluster, which offers synchronous replication across clustered MySQL nodes. As Jerry Rudisin, Schooner's CEO, told El Reg back in the spring, this is better than the kludgey asynchronous replication, which has a production database backing up to one master and then propagating changes to slave nodes, that is part of Oracle's MySQL stack. Oracle also sells MySQL Cluster, which does synchronous replication, but that feature does not work with the InnoDB engine, which is popular among MySQL shops.

After taking some shots at Oracle for its asynchronous replication for MySQL earlier this year, Rudisin tells El Reg that customers said they needed this capability not within the data center or the metro distances (60 miles or less) that the Active Cluster feature can work over, but for longer hauls to provide true geographically remote disaster recovery. You can't fight the speed of light, so you can't do synchronous replication beyond that 60 mile distance. But, says Rudisin, you can do a better job speeding up asynchronous replication.

With the new features in the MySQL variant, which is now called SchoonerSQL v5.1, the updating of remote master and slave databases has been parallelized to make use of all the cores and threads in the machine, rather than running in series on one thread. This radically reduces the time it takes to do a failover from a production database in one location, and a backup database over a wide area network. This seemingly minor change means that a failover and recovery from a remote data center can take place in seconds to minutes, instead of minutes to hours.

In addition to parallelizing the updates to the MySQL 5.1 Enterprise Edition database, the asynchronous replication feature of the SchoonerSQL database knows that it can do reads almost instantly, and queues up writes until the database is updated with transactions that were in flight when the spit hit the fan. This also helps speed up recovery times.

Schooner is offering SchoonerSQL 5.1 under a free trial, which you can participate in here. SchoonerSQL 5.1 will be available in mid-November and will include both the asynch and synch replication features bundled into the price. The database costs $9,500 per two-sockets in a server and will be certified on recent RHEL and CentOS releases of Linux as well as on mainstream IBM, Dell, and Hewlett-Packard x86 servers with popular flash storage drives. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Bitcasa bins $10-a-month Infinite storage offer
Firm cites 'low demand' plus 'abusers'
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
AWS pulls desktop-as-a-service from the PC
Support for PCoIP protocol means zero clients can run cloudy desktops
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
New hybrid storage solutions
Tackling data challenges through emerging hybrid storage solutions that enable optimum database performance whilst managing costs and increasingly large data stores.