The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

FSF takes Win 8 Secure Boot fight to OEMs

Punters urged to bombard PC makers

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

PC makers are being lobbied to install Windows 8 on machines in a way that will afford users the freedom to boot Linux or any other operating system.

The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is urging PC users to sign a statement demanding that OEMs which implement Windows 8's UEFI Secure Boot do so in a way that allows individuals to disable it, or that the PC makers provide a "sure-fire way" to install and run an operating system of the user's choice.

The statement says that giving this choice will protect users' rights and security.

The FSF has also hinted at a boycott on buying Windows 8 PCs. "We commit that we will neither purchase nor recommend computers that strip users of this critical freedom, and we will actively urge people in our communities to avoid such jailed systems," the FSF concludes.

Windows 8's Secure Boot was branded "Restricted Boot" by the FSF because "it would be a disastrous restriction on computer users and not a security feature at all".

The FSF's website became suddenly unavailable Tuesday morning due to "technical problems" once word of the campaign began to spread.

Secure Boot is a planned feature of Windows 8 intended to thwart a type of hack that targets the boot path; the idea is to ensure only signed "good code" will boot up.

Microsoft's system implements the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) firmware specification, only the system in Windows 8 would mean any Windows 8 PC that ships with only OEM and Microsoft keys will not boot a generic build of Linux.

The red flag was raised by Red Hat employee and tech blogger Matthew Garrett here and Professor Ross Anderson of Cambridge University here. Anderson said Secure Boot might violate EU competition law.

Microsoft, meanwhile, has shifted responsibility for Secure Boot to the PC manufacturers. In a blog response to the alarm, Microsoft ecosystem team member Tony Mangefeste wrote: "OEMs are free to choose how to enable this support and can further customize the parameters as described above in an effort to deliver unique value propositions to their customers."

However, it seems OEMs are not free to choose how to enable Secure Boot.

All About Microsoft's Mary-Jo Foley reports that at Microsoft's Build conference in California last month, Microsoft said support for UEFI Secure Boot is a Windows 8 certification requirement.

Meanwhile, on the Windows 8 blog in response to concern about UEFI, Mangefeste went on to claim: "At the end of the day, the customer is in control of their PC."

Responding to Mangefeste, Garrett called the rebuttal "entirely factually accurate", adding "but it's also misleading" – because the PC marker and Microsoft would maintain control over the keys needed to permit trusted code to boot on PCs.

"The truth is that Microsoft's move removes control from the end user and places it in the hands of Microsoft and the hardware vendors," Garrett wrote in response to Mangefeste here. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Of course it's a security feature

It secures Microsoft's revenue stream.

14
2

Agreed. I used to work at a local retail/repair shop where we also built new PCs. In theory, we could put whatever OS we wanted on the system, but if we put anything other that Windows on our new-build machines, we would lose our "discount" and any hope of being able to sell the machines at a competitive price (already difficult since we used quality hardware with solid manufacturer's warranties as opposed to the flimsy crap in the big boys' systems).

So... of course you can disobey MS, but you'll go out of business if you do. Unfortunately, they can say they weren't "forcing" us since, in theory, we could do whatever we wanted. In practice, you obey Redmond or go bankrupt....

7
0

Point A

"Prevent older versions of Windows booting on those machines"

I think this, more than anything else is Microsoft's plan. The last thing they want is a repeat of the Vista debacle where users buy shiny new machines and then install XP.

5
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
Apple said to be 'exploring' 5.7-inch iPhone
Who's the copycat this time, Mr. Cook?
Samsung plans LTE Advanced version of Galaxy S4
1Gbps download capability could stiffen drooping S4 sales forecasts
Google Chromebooks now in over 6,600 stores
Major, worldwide retail push begins this summer
Review: Belkin Thunderbolt Express Dock
Missing Mac ports reunited, for a price