The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Michael Dell declines to eat his Apple (humble) pie

1997 'shut it down' advice explained

Web 2.0 Summit On the day Apple releases its quarterly results, which are broadly expected to make it the most valuable company the world, Michael Dell attempted to explain his infamous comment that Apple should be shut down and sold off.

In 1997, Dell was speaking at a Gartner symposium and was asked what advice he would give to the new Apple chief executive Steve Jobs. He replied that Apple should shut itself down and give the money back to its shareholders. Dell was asked about that comment on Tuesday at the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco, and sought to explain his remarks.

He hadn’t liked the question in the first place, he said, and replied twice that he didn’t give advice to other chief executives, since he was focused on Dell. In the end, he made his comment as a way of shutting down the questioning.

“The meaning of my answer was I'm the CEO of Dell, my answer was largely misconstrued,” he said.

Michael Dell at Web 2.0 2011

Michael Dell (left) forced to eat humble Apple pie

He praised Apple’s current position, but pointed out that Dell’s stock had risen 16,000 per cent since it went public, so the company wasn’t doing too badly. He also paid tribute to Steve Jobs, and was visibly downcast as he recalled first meeting Jobs at an Apple users group in Texas when he was 16 years old, and how the two men had become friends later in life.

In a wide-ranging discussion, Dell said his firm was switching over to services, with 40 per cent of staff currently working on that side of the business. He emphasized, however, that he was also committed to staying in the business and consumer hardware space and had no plans for selling off divisions, as HP is considering.

While he refused to be drawn on giving advice to the new HP boss Meg Whitman – perhaps in light of his comments 14 years ago – he did say that the current confusion at HP was a major opportunity for Dell and its partners. Enterprises, in particular, were very concerned about HP’s future in the hardware space, he said.

“Any uncertainty and confusion in the industry is an opportunity. It's an opportunity to explain to customers our commitment to the industry and what we do," he said. "We’ve also been recruiting a lot of new partners recently, with over 100,000 signed up.” ®

He was right, based on the information he had at the time. Subsequent information doesn't change that.

Steve Jobs took a risk and it paid off but it was a *big* risk. The sort of risk that either makes you a billionaire or leaves you wandering the streets in the tattered remains of your last suit. He was right too. They were both right, it just depends on how you look at it.

15
2

@Steve Evans

"In the parallel universe where 1997 saw the end of Apple, I don't think anyone will be casting any blame for not sticking with it. Jobs pulled off a 1000:1 shot."

I think it was a million-to-one shot, and everybody knows you can always pull those off! Just ask Sergeant Colon

9
0

@Goat Jam

Hindsight is 20-20.

In 1997 I don't think anyone could have predicted what Jobs could and would do with Apple, and I doubt anyone else would have managed it. It was "his baby" after all. He was a rather unique driving force, and we'll have to see what happens now he's gone.

In the parallel universe where 1997 saw the end of Apple, I don't think anyone will be casting any blame for not sticking with it. Jobs pulled off a 1000:1 shot.

8
1

He was right!

In 1997, Apple didn't have the Ipod, the Iphone or the Ianything worth having. They had Ifuckall apart from a loss making company selling obscure devices in graphics and eduction.

Michael Dell was right. Apple's fortune was completely out of the blue (not neccessarily luck, but not predictable either) or the share price wouldn't have risen 150% in the year following the first IPod.

Apple have done well, but the only logical decision looking at a 1997 balance sheet was pull the bleedin plug and fast.

15
9

" How Was He Right?"

To put it another way...

Beside the logo, what is now left of the Apple of 1997?

Would it be different if, instead of going on with Apple, another company was created to market the iThingies?

However, the hypothesis of saying that just to force some journos to shut up is credible...

5
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Apple cored: Samsung sells 10 million Galaxy S4 in a month
Beware of South Koreans bearing Android
Microsoft reveals Xbox One, the console that can read your heartbeat
Upgrades Live service – and no always-on requirement
US boffin builds 32-way Raspberry Pi cluster
Beowulf cluster built for the price of a single PC
Is the next-gen console war already One?
Microsoft’s new Xbox - and more
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
STROKE this mouse to make apps POP, says Microsoft
Windows 8 Start button comes to Redmond's rodents
Nintendo throws flaming legal barrel at YouTubing fans
All your walk-through vid revenue are belong to us

Hands on with Hyper-V 3.0 and virtual machine movement

Our award-winning Regcasts have teamed up with training provider QA for the deepest of deep dives into Hyper-V, including a live demo.

Understand VM movement - just click to play, or go here for a bigger version.