Feeds

Apple and Samsung discuss... CPU production deal

Korean spin suggests A6 producer not picked

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Business security measures using SSL

Samsung and Apple may be suing each other left, right and centre, but that hasn't stopped them talking about chip production partnerships.

Yes, Apple and Samsung continue to discuss silicon projects, according to a unnamed source "from an Apple parts supplier based in Korea" cited by the Korea Times.

Local supplier of parts to Apple? Must be Samsung then. Which other local supplier would know?

Samsung currently punches out A5 processors and other choice chippery for Apple, but may be displaced by Taiwanese foundry TSMC when it comes to producing Apple's next mobile CPU, the A6, said to be - but with no real evidence other than likelihood - a quad-core part.

Whatever you think of it as a brand or of its company philosophy, Apple is a shrewd business operation. With a new processor in the works, it will have been talking to Samsung, as its existing supplier, and to potential alternatives, such as TSMC - the world's number one chip foundry, a company that manufacturers silicon for other firms - and, we'd say, UMC, also Taiwanese and the world's number two chip foundry.

Potential contract winners can be played off against each other during negotiations to get the best possible deal, and Apple is good at gaining great terms.

So Apple is not only likely to be still talking to Samsung, but there's mileage from Samsung in suggesting it's not yet out of the picture.

Since it was claimed back in July that TMSC had already started work on the A6 - a process that take six months or more as the supplier strives to ensures its kit is capable of producing the required product at economically viable yields.

If TSMC does indeed have an A6 deal, that doesn't preclude Apple from looking to a second source to ensure it gets the number of chips it needs.

We can say that if Apple expects to include the A6 in the upcoming iPad 3, as some pundits have predicted, it had better get a move on an pick a supplier. If, indeed, it hasn't already. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Oi, Tim Cook. Apple Watch. I DARE you to tell me, IN PERSON, that it's secure
State attorney demands Apple CEO bows the knee to him
4K-ing excellent TV is on its way ... in its own sweet time, natch
For decades Hollywood actually binned its 4K files. Doh!
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
DARPA-backed jetpack prototype built to make soldiers run faster
4 Minute Mile project hatched to speed up tired troops
Hey, Mac fanbois. HGST wants you drooling over its HUGE desktop RACK
What vast digital media repository could possibly need 64 TERABYTES?
Apple's Watch is basically electric perfume
It isn't just me-too Apple that's lost its lustre: Gadget mania is over
In a spin: Samsung accuses LG exec of washing machine SABOTAGE
Rival electronic giant tries to iron out allegations
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.